Abstract
The clear cells renal carcinoma are the renal tumor of bigger worldwide incidence. His presentation oscillates in patient elders of 50 years, rare in younger patients of that age. This article presents a fatal case of renal carcinoma of clear cells in young patients. It has to do with a feminine patient of 34 elderly years that you were relieving with the use of analgesics that attends with abdominal pain in inferior left-hand hemiabdomen of great intensity, sharp, localized type and winker. Painful abdomen to the palpation and palpable mass at left-hand flank and fist painful percussion at renal homonymous grave. After confirmation and delimitation of the mass for tomography, they accomplished two weeks to him after radical nefrectomy left-hand, with analysis histopatologic of the anatomic piece of renal carcinoma of clear cells Status I. Status that the advanced die could be still further the pulmonary nodule found in tomography of abdomen, but without data of biopsy. To sorrow of his show off good prognosis, studies the posterior, post-operative and his- remaining- stay tomográficos evidenced abscesses and thrombus in the inferior vena cava, than united to clinical complications like shock hypovolemic, septic, intestinal occlusion and renal intense lesion, relapse, progression or a stadium suspected tumoral once much more the start was moved up to. You perished after 26 lay days for mixed shock despite the intensive measures. This case evidenced the peculiarity of the renal carcinoma of clear cells in a young patient, as well as his correct identification of fatal suggestive complications of advanced stadiums.
Keywords
Renal carcinoma, Intensive care, Nephrology, Oncology
INTRODUCTION
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCR) is the most common malignant renal tumor in adults, accounting for 75–90% of all malignant renal neoplasms and approximately 2–3% of all cancers worldwide, with a predominance of presentation beginning in the sixth decade of life and a mean age of 64 years; currently, its occurrence in individuals under 40 years of age is considered rare. (1,2) Among its main histopathological subtypes, clear cell carcinoma is the most common and lethal variant, accounting for 80% of all renal carcinomas, with sarcomatoid differentiation in 5% of these cases, which results in invasive–aggressive behavior with a poor prognosis and poor therapeutic response. (3,4)
Its classic triad, characterized by hematuria, flank pain, and a palpable mass, is observed in less than 11% of cases and indicates advanced disease, whereas most cases are detected incidentally at early stages and are amenable to curative treatment via surgery. However, this probability of cure is not entirely related to the stage or degree of tumor spread, and a significant proportion of patients may experience rapid progression, tumor recurrence, and thromboembolic and infectious complications. (1,2,5,6,7)
Despite the literature supporting its prognosis and complications, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) presents a wide range of clinical presentations, making it challenging; therefore, academic training in these presentations is essential, as it is more difficult to manage. (1,2,5) Therefore, the main objective is to describe the presentation of fatal clear cell renal cell carcinoma in a young female patient.
CASE PRESENTATION
Initial Presentation and Tests
A 34-year-old female patient presented with a significant history of 3 cesarean sections, the last 8 years ago, an allergy to tramadol, and a smoking habit for 2 months at age 15, at a rate of 2 cigarettes per day. She began experiencing pain in the lower left quadrant of her abdomen a month and a half ago. The pain was severe—rated 10/10 on the visual analog scale (VAS)—and described as sharp, localized, and intermittent, with relief provided by analgesics. This pain was accompanied by nausea that did not progress to vomiting, with no other symptoms.
On physical examination, the following findings were noted: tenderness on superficial palpation of the left flank using bimanual maneuvers. A mass with irregular and indistinct borders was noted, firm in consistency and nonmobile, with tenderness on percussion with a fist in the renal fossa on that side.
Following admission, laboratory tests were ordered (Table 1, Column A), which revealed mild to moderate anemia, with no signs of renal failure or electrolyte abnormalities, as well as a urinalysis that showed no gross or microscopic hematuria. The following day, a plain computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and chest was ordered (Figure 1), which confirmed a tumor mass in the left kidney and a single nodular lesion in the lung, suggesting metastasis.
The patient stated in her medical history that she had undergone abdominal ultrasound days earlier, which revealed a left kidney with loss of the cortex and an enlarged upper pole with a hypoechoic mass measuring 61 x 51 mm, without evidence of vascularization. This study confirmed that the loss of normal renal morphology and the presence of a solid, expansive mass were not recent onset.

Supplementary | Column A (on admission) | Column B Postnephrectomy (in ICU) | Column C post-ICU (predeath) |
|---|---|---|---|
Hemoglobin | 9.6 g/dL | 10.3 g/dL | 10.2 g/dL |
Hematocrit | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.30 |
Platelet count | 409 x 10⁹/L | 144 x 10⁹/L | 400 x 10⁹/L |
White blood cells | 9.3 x 10⁹/L | 3.6 x 10⁹/L | 11.3 x 10⁹/L |
Neutrophils (%) | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.89 |
Urea | 37 mg/dL | 26.7 mg/dL | 210 mg/dL |
Creatinine | 1.2 mg/dL | 2.7 mg/dL | 2.4 mg/dL |
Na (sodium) | 139 mmol/L | 139 mmol/L | - |
K (potassium) | 4.15 mmol/L | 4.9 mmol/L | - |
Cl (chlorine) | 103.5 mmol/L | 101 mmol/L | - |
Ca (calcium) | 9.6 mg/dL | 8.1 mg/dL | - |
P (phosphorus) | 3.83 mg/dL | 7 mg/dL | - |
Mg (magnesium) | 2.36 mg/dL | 1.9 mg/dL | - |
LDH | 256 U/L | - | - |
Surgical procedure and intraoperative findings
Two weeks after the CT scan, the patient was taken to the operating room (Day 0) and underwent radical left nephrectomy with resection of the descending colon, Hartmann’s pouch closure plus transverse colostomy, and placement of a left drain directed to the renal bed. A 10 x 5 cm tumor was also excised (Figure 2a) and sent to the Department of Pathology, which reported a histopathological diagnosis of unifocal clear cell renal cell carcinoma (Figure 2b).
However, no surrounding tissue was available (unknown causes), and the tumor was reported to be confined to the kidney, with no extension to the capsule or perirenal fat; additionally, the adrenal gland, lymph node dissection, artery, vein, ureter, and no lymphovascular infiltration were performed (result: stage I pT1b (7 cm, confined to the kidney), pN0, M0). The M0 report is inconsistent with the findings of a nodular mass in the lung, but no biopsy was available to rule out or confirm metastasis.


Figure 2b. Histological examination. Upper right and left images: tumor areas with zones of necrosis and hemorrhage. Lower left and right images: cells with clear, eosinophilic cytoplasm, arranged in solid nests.
Postoperative Course and Complications
During surgery, the patient lost 3000 ml of blood over the course of 280 minutes of operation; consequently, she received 4 units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) plus 2 units of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and vasopressor support with norepinephrine at a rate of 0.2 mcg/kg/min. During the immediate postoperative period, another unit of FFP was transfused.
Upon transfer to the ward, she was hypotensive, with blood pressure readings of 70/40 mmHg and tachycardia at 130 beats per minute. She remained on treatment with vasoactive amines, in addition to another PB. A consultation was made with the intensive care unit (ICU) because of her state of shock, and the following day (Day 1), additional laboratory tests were performed (Table 1, Column B), which revealed mild thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and signs of acute kidney injury (AKI) of the renal type (creatinine elevated to twice its previous value, urea-to-creatinine ratio less than 10:1, mild hypocalcemia, and mild to moderate hyperphosphatemia).
The day after these tests (day 2), a CT scan was performed again (Figure 3), as the patient presented with a colostomy exhibiting very low output and bloody discharge, with an apparent abdominal infection. He was taken back to the operating room (day 3), where an exploratory laparotomy with cavity debridement, appendectomy, stoma reconstruction, and drain placement was performed. He was subsequently admitted to the ICU because of postoperative risk and remained on vasopressor support but with no evidence of hypovolemia or bleeding.

ICU Management and Outcomes
During her stay in the ICU, without the need for assisted ventilation, she began experiencing fever spikes and seroachocolatic discharge. Five days later (day 8), a contrast-enhanced CT scan of the chest and abdomen was performed again (Figures 4a and b). After evaluation by the angiography service, she was deemed ineligible for surgical treatment because of a high risk of pulmonary embolism. Moreover, medical treatment was initiated with sodium heparin at a dosage of 60–80 U/kg as an intravenous bolus, followed by 14–18 U/kg/h via an infusion pump.

After two days in the ICU (day 10), she was discharged for maximum benefit, and during her stay in the ward, she presented with sluggish progress and, once again, febrile spikes and laboratory results (Table 1 C predeath), indicating infection with marked leukocytosis with a predominance of neutrophils, as well as elevated urea levels with worsening renal acute kidney injury (AKI) plus a prerenal component. Antimicrobial therapy was initiated with meropenem at a dosage of 500 mg every 8 hours, and the benefits against the risks of low excretion and/or worsening renal function were weighed.
Two days later (day 12), she underwent surgery again for mechanical intestinal obstruction and complicated intra-abdominal infection, during which blood loss of 200 ml was reported, and she received a transfusion of 1 unit of packed red blood cells plus 3 units of fresh frozen plasma. Despite all therapeutic measures, the following afternoon (day 13), she was pronounced dead after a 26-day hospital stay, with a clinical diagnosis of mixed shock (hypovolemic shock + septic shock). The family did not provide consent for an autopsy.
Ethical considerations: Informed consent was obtained from the patient while she was still alive for the presentation of her case. Similarly, the statistics of the Second Declaration of Helsinki were considered, and the patient’s rights were preserved.
DISCUSSION
The scientific literature has traditionally reported favorable outcomes for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) in localized stages. However, substantial heterogeneity in the presentation and course of this neoplasm can lead to paradoxical outcomes even when the pathological stage suggests a good prognosis. Although most SCCs are detected incidentally at early stages and are amenable to curative treatment via surgery, between 20% and 40% of these tumors may present with locoregional recurrence or progression to metastatic disease. This phenomenon is particularly striking in young patients, in whom CRC is considered a rare presentation, accounting for only 8.7% of all diagnosed cases. (2,8)
In this context, Almeida Esquivel et al. (4) reported the case of a 59-year-old patient with clear-cell RCC who, despite renal-ileal invasion, had favorable clinical and surgical outcomes following radical nephrectomy. Similarly, López Romero et al. (2) described a 37-year-old patient with a 10-cm infiltrating CRCC and extensive areas of necrosis who also had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged early without complications or evidence of relapse at six months of follow-up.
These cases contrast sharply with the poor outcomes observed in other patients, such as those reported by Baez et al. (7), in which a 63-year-old man with sarcomatoid chromophobe carcinoma and a thrombus in the inferior vena cava (IVC) died 15 days after pulmonary embolism, sepsis, and multiple organ failure. This discrepancy underscores the unpredictable nature of CRC, even in early stages.
One of the most relevant and paradoxical findings in the course of some patients with localized CRCC is the development of central venous thrombosis, particularly in the IVC. The incidence of IVC thrombosis in stage I CRCC is exceptionally rare and is estimated to be less than 1% in a series of nephrectomies for tumors ≤7 cm. Its presence in the absence of direct tumor invasion or distant metastasis raises the hypothesis that such thrombosis may constitute a postoperative complication mediated by perioperative factors rather than by the tumor stage per se. (9,10,11)
In the same vein, the case reported by Roberts et al. (11) emphasizes that intraoperative embolization of the thrombus during IVC thrombectomy is a lethal complication requiring emergency management with cardiopulmonary bypass, although the authors note that this event is rare when appropriate surgical techniques are applied.
The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this cascade of serious complications in patients with localized RCC may be multiple and synergistic. First, massive intraoperative hemorrhage, such as that described by Duvarcı et al. (12), in their series of laparoscopic nephrectomies, where blood loss was significantly lower and no serious postoperative complications were observed, induces a state of coagulopathy due to dilution and consumption, activates the coagulation cascade through tissue exposure and endothelial damage, and generates a paradoxical prothrombotic state during the immediate postoperative period. (9,10,13)
This context favors the formation of central venous thrombi without the need for direct tumor invasion. Kowal et al. (14) reported that the consistency of the venous thrombus, assessable through radiomic analysis of computed tomography, is a critical predictor of overall survival, with friable thrombi posing the highest risk of perioperative detachment and pulmonary embolism.
Postoperative sepsis is a well-recognized complication of complex oncologic surgeries, particularly in patients who have undergone multiple organ resections or who have experienced massive bleeding, according to the guidelines of the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG). (13,15) Additional activation of coagulation via the tissue factor pathway inhibits fibrinolysis by increasing plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), leading to microthrombosis and multiorgan dysfunction. Moreover, the interaction between systemic inflammation and thrombosis is particularly relevant in CRCC, given that this tumor is known for its ability to secrete proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which establish a baseline prothrombotic state. Prolonged surgical stress, massive hemorrhage, and postoperative infection act as triggers that amplify this systemic inflammatory response, perpetuating thrombosis and organ failure even in the absence of residual tumor or demonstrated metastasis. (7,9,10)
The spectrum of metastatic presentations of CRC is extremely broad and often unpredictable. Gasque Rodrigo et al. (16) reported the presence of vesicular metastases in a 78-year-old female patient two years after nephrectomy for stage II CRC, with a favorable outcome following cholecystectomy. Similarly, García García et al. (17) described thyroid metastasis as the initial presentation of CRCC, and O'Farril Anzures et al. (1) reported that metastasis to sacral soft tissue occurred 8 years after primary nephrectomy. Even García Molina et al. (18) reported an exceptional case of parotid metastasis from a CRCC with a concurrent arterial pseudoaneurysm.
These late recurrences at atypical sites demonstrate that CRC may have indolent biological behavior for years but respond favorably to salvage surgery. Moreover, the presence of metastases in unusual sites, such as the inferior vena cava, sepsis, and massive hemorrhage, is consistently associated with severe outcomes and more advanced stages than suggested by the initial histology. (7,13,15)
Based on the experience gained from this case, the following modifications are recommended:
- In the presence of a solitary pulmonary nodule without a biopsy, complete the work up with a positron emission tomography (PET) scan or lung biopsy to determine whether surgery should be curative or cytoreductive.
- In the presence of a large renal mass with necrosis and visible bleeding, plan for selective preoperative embolization and ensure ample availability of blood products.
- In cases of massive postoperative blood loss, D-dimer, fibrinogen, and coagulation times should be monitored, and venous Doppler and contrast-enhanced CT should be performed within the first 3–5 days to rule out inferior vena cava thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, especially if infection or organ failure develops.
Among the limitations of this case is that a postmortem examination was not performed because of the family’s refusal, which could have confirmed occult tumor spread, lymphovascular microinvasion, or vascular wall infiltration. Furthermore, a sarcomatoid component (focal or within the thrombus) could not be ruled out because of the absence of immunohistochemistry and a second pathological review. As this is a single-case report, it cannot be generalized, but it does allow for the formulation of hypotheses.
Among the practical lessons learned is that stage I clear cell renal cell carcinoma is not synonymous with postoperative benignity. The triple association of massive hemorrhage, abdominal infection, and central venous thrombosis can trigger mixed shock and death without confirmed metastases. Extreme vigilance for thromboembolism is warranted following massive bleeding, and serial imaging studies should be ordered. In cases of sepsis without a clear focus, retroperitoneal abscesses or septic vena cava thrombosis are suspected. Finally, an autopsy is insisted upon, as its absence severely limits diagnostic feedback.
CONCLUSIONS
Stage I clear cell renal cell carcinoma does not rule out the possibility of serious postoperative complications typically associated with advanced disease, such as inferior vena cava thrombosis, retroperitoneal abscesses, and mixed shock. In young patients, the presence of massive intraoperative hemorrhage and multivisceral resection should raise suspicion of a prothrombotic and inflammatory state that may persist even in the absence of confirmed metastases. The absence of an autopsy and a complete immunohistochemical study limits the ability to rule out occult sarcomatoid components. In these cases, exercising extreme vigilance for central venous thrombosis during the postoperative period and considering early serial imaging studies are recommended.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Leonides Pernia Plana, Department of Radiology at Celia Sánchez Manduley Hospital, for his assistance in interpreting the CT images.
References
- 1 O’Farril Anzures R, Llamas Ceras ML, Pulido López RA, Romero Sánchez JA. Tumor metastásico en tejido blando a nivel del sacro secundario a carcinoma de células claras de riñón. Reporte de caso. rev.colomb. cir. [Internet]. 2024 [citado 14 de abril de 2026]; 39(2): 339-347. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2011-75822024000200339&lng=en.
- 2 López Romero CA, Anguiano González JP, Campo Guzmán LE, et al. Presentación de cáncer renal de células claras en una edad más temprana. Sal Jal [Internet]. 2023 [citado 11 de abril de 2026]; 10(Suppl: 1): s30-35. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/113698
- 3 Manresa Barrueco LC, Rodríguez Torres CA. Caracterización clínica-epidemiológica de pacientes con tumores renales. Hospital Provincial Saturnino Lora. 2020- 2024. UNIMED [Internet]. 2026 [citado 19 de abril de 2026]; 8(1): e443. Disponible en: https://revunimed.sld.cu/index.php/revestud/article/view/443
- 4 Almeida Esquivel Y, Piñón García K, De Zayas Pelegrín L. Carcinoma renal de células claras con diferenciación sarcomatoide. Rev Ciencias Médicas [Internet]. 2021 [citado 11 de abril de 2026]; 25(3): aprox. 4 pantallas. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1561-31942021000300021&lng=es.
- 5 Rodríguez Cruzata L. Incidencia del carcinoma de células renales en Santiago de Cuba. Rev. inf. cient. [Internet]. 2022 [citado 15 de abril de 2026]; 101(1): aprox. 4 pantallas. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1028-99332022000100008&lng=es.
- 6 Castañeda Millán DA, Puentes Montenegro DR, Mariño Gómez MF, Camacho Nieto D. Eficacia oncológica de la terapia adyuvante en pacientes con carcinoma renal de células claras localizado comparado con la terapia estándar: una scoping review. Urol. Colomb. [Internet]. 2025 [citado 10 de abril de 2026]; 34(2): 106-118. Disponible en http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2027-01192025000200106&lng=en.
- 7 Baez NP, Tekin A, Sleeman D, Alvarez A, Ciancio G. Large sarcomatoidchromophobe renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus extending into the inferior vena cava: a case report on the challenges and lessons from a fatal outcome. Ann TranslMed [Internet]. 2026 [citado 17 de abril de 2026]; 14(1): 4. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12981990/
- 8 Castañeda Millán DA, Puentes Montenegro DR, Mariño Gómez MF, Camacho Nieto D. Eficacia oncológica de la terapia adyuvante en pacientes con carcinoma renal de células claras localizado comparado con la terapia estándar: una scopingreview. Urol. Colomb. [Internet]. 2025 [citado 22/03 2026]; 34(2): 106-118. Disponible en http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2027-01192025000200106&lng=en.
- 9 Rathmell WK, Rumble RB, Van Veldhuizen PJ, et al. Management of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40(25): 2957-2995. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.00868
- 10 Urman D, Deshler L, Weise N, et al. Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma With Non-Clear Cell Histology Treated With Systemic Therapy. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023; 21(6): 660-668.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.09.004
- 11 Roberts SA, Satija D, Gold H, et al. Intraoperativeembolization during inferior vena cava tumor thrombectomy for renal cell carcinoma. J KidneyCancer VHL [Internet]. 2023 [citado 16 de abril de 2026]; 10(4): 43-49. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10764280/
- 12 Duvarcı M, Ceylan O, Beyatlı M, et al. Initial Experiences of Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in a Tertiary Oncology Center: An Analysis of 142 Cases. Cureus [Internet]. 2024 [citado 17 de abril de 2026]; 16(4): e59382. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11139056/
- 13 Soares A, Monteiro FSM, da Trindade KM, et al. Advanced renal cell carcinoma management: the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG) consensus update. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2024 [citado 23/03/2021]; 150(4): 183. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11003910/
- 14 Kowal P, Ratajczyk K, Bursiewicz W, et al. Differentiation of venous thrombus consistency in patients with renal cell carcinoma using volumetric analysis of computed tomography first-order radiomic features. BMC Cancer [Internet]. 2026 [citado 23/03/2026]; 26(1): 187. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12874737/
- 15 Zequi SC, de Oliveira Galvão A, Costa Matos A, et al. Renal cell cancer treatment: the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG) surgery-focused consensus update. Ther Adv Urol [Internet]. 2025 [citado 23/03/2026]; 17(1): 17562872241312581. Disponible en: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12033548/
- 16 Gasque Rodrigo A, Vera Andrea B, Mocciaro D, Díaz Pantoja JP, Moreno Walter A, Vigilante Gabriel E. Metástasis de carcinoma renal de células claras en la vesícula biliar. Medicina (B. Aires) [Internet]. 2023 [citado 11 de abril de 2026]; 83(6): 998-1002. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0025-76802023001000998&lng=es.
- 17 García García B, Morales García D, Fernández Serrano JL, Soler Humanes R, Ocaña Willhelmi LT. Metástasis tiroidea como forma de presentación de carcinoma renal de células claras. CirAndal [Internet]. 2022 [citado 11 de abril de 2026]; 33(4): 491-493. Disponible en: https://www.asacirujanos.com/revista/2022/33/4/16
- 18 García Molina F, Aliaga Sánchez A, Ricote Sánchez G, Aliaga Rodríguez A, Martínez Díaz F. Metástasis parotídea de carcinoma de células claras renal con presencia simultánea de pseudoaneurisma arterial. Caso clínico y revisión de la literatura. RevEspCirug Oral y Maxilofac [Internet]. 2022 [citado 12 de abril de 2026]; 44(3): 112-118. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-05582022000300004&lng=es
Declarations
Funding
No funding was received for the development of this article.
Conflict of interest
None.
Authorship contributions
NRBF: Methodology, project management, visualization, validation, writing–review and editing.
JGCR: Conceptualization, research, methodology, project management, visualization, validation, supervision, writing–review and editing.
LMCM: Conceptualization, research, methodology, project management, visualization, validation, supervision, writing–review and editing.
LABR: Methodology, project management, visualization, validation, writing–review and editing.