Telemedicine in clinical practice: challenges and benefits for healthcare: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Telemedicine represents one of the most notable advances in contemporary clinical practice, facilitating access to health services in high-demand settings or those with geographical limitations. (1,2) The definitive impetus for its implementation came during the COVID-19 pandemic, where the need for social distancing accelerated its global adoption. (3) From its earliest applications in the 1960s, used to remotely monitor vital signs in space, to the consolidation of complex virtual care platforms, telemedicine has evolved into a complementary—and, in many cases, essential—model within healthcare systems. (4)

Currently, its applications include teleconsultation, telemonitoring, telediagnosis, and teletherapy, which have enabled expanded access in rural areas, reduced waiting times, improved chronic disease management, and promoted continuity of care. (5,6) Furthermore, it has been key to empowering patients in their self-care and facilitating health education. (5) Despite these benefits, significant challenges remain, such as gaps in technological access, the need for digital literacy, data security and confidentiality, and limitations in the doctor-patient relationship due to the absence of physical contact. (7,8)

This study aims to systematically analyze the current scientific evidence on the impact of telemedicine in clinical practice, evaluating its benefits, limitations, and opportunities for continuous improvement. The central hypothesis proposes that telemedicine not only increases the efficiency of the healthcare system but also contributes to more equitable care, provided that adequate measures are implemented to mitigate its barriers. (6,9,10)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study consisted of a systematic review of the scientific literature to identify, analyze, and synthesize existing evidence on the impact of telemedicine on clinical practice. It focused particularly on its application in the management of chronic diseases, continuity of care, and the doctor-patient relationship. To this end, recognized electronic databases used in the biomedical field were consulted, such as PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, and Google Scholar. These databases were selected for their breadth of themes, coverage of the health sciences, and access to peer-reviewed scientific literature.

MeSH descriptors and keywords such as “Telemedicine,” “Health Care,” “Chronic Diseases,” “Physician-Patient Relationship,” “Health Efficiency,” and “Continuity of Care” were used. The initial database search identified 426 articles. After removing 37 duplicates, 389 records were evaluated by title and abstract, and 51 studies were selected for full-text review. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 13 scientific articles were included in the final analysis of this review. The inclusion and exclusion criteria applied during the study selection process are detailed in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

The article selection process was conducted in three sequential phases: initial review of titles, evaluation of abstracts, and critical reading of the full text. The methodology followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to ensure rigor, transparency, and reproducibility.

Data synthesis was qualitative, structured in a narrative format, which allowed for the identification of trends, similarities, differences, and gaps in the existing literature.

RESULTS

After applying the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 13 scientific articles were selected for the final analysis, covering different methodological approaches (qualitative studies, quantitative studies, case studies, and systematic reviews) and geographic contexts (Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Angola, and European n countries). The findings were organized into five main categories: clinical benefits, economic impact, technological and organizational barriers, ethical and legal aspects, and the doctor-patient relationship.

1. Clinical and Care Benefits

Several studies agree that telemedicine improves diagnostic efficiency, access to specialists, and continuity of care, especially for patients with chronic diseases.(8,9,11) A notable example was the use of teleneurology in Brazil’s public healthcare system, which significantly reduced unnecessary referrals, optimized care flows, and shortened the time to clinical decision-making. (10)

Furthermore, it was observed that telemedicine can be effective in postoperative follow-up, for patients with reduced mobility, and in regions with a shortage of specialized healthcare personnel. (12)

2. Economic Impact and Resource Optimization

Studies identified a significant reduction in costs associated with patient transport, avoidable hospitalizations, and unnecessary use of high-complexity resources. Ekeland et al. (2010) conducted a systematic review that concluded that telemedicine has the potential to reduce costs without compromising the quality of care. (6,7)

Similarly, in low-income settings such as Angola, telemedicine has been implemented to expand access without requiring massive investments in physical infrastructure. (9)

3. Technological, Organizational, and Cultural Barriers

Despite the reported benefits, multiple barriers persist that hinder the implementation of telemedicine. These include a lack of interoperability between systems, the absence of integrated electronic health records, a shortage of specific training, and resistance from professionals and patients. (8,9)

The study by Arteche et al. showed that, in Latin America, the digital divide between urban and rural regions limits the scalability of telemedicine. Bolivia, for example, faces serious infrastructure and connectivity limitations that hinder its widespread adoption. (12)

4. Ethical, Legal, and Regulatory Aspects

Regulating telemedicine remains a challenge. Several authors highlighted the need for clear regulations on the protection of personal data, professional liability, the legal validity of remote medical acts, and the confidentiality of electronically transmitted information. (7,8)

In some Latin American countries, legal gaps create legal uncertainty for healthcare professionals. The lack of common accreditation and certification standards for telemedicine services was also cited as a limitation.

5. Doctor-patient relationship and humanization of care

One of the most debated issues is the impact of telemedicine on the doctor-patient relationship. Some studies argue that the absence of physical contact and limitations in nonverbal communication weaken the bond. (7) However, other studies indicate that, with well-structured systems and adequate training, it is possible to maintain the quality of interaction and promote patient empowerment. (8,10)

DISCUSSION

The results of this systematic review demonstrate that telemedicine has established itself as an effective strategy for expanding access to health services, optimizing resource use, and improving continuity of care, especially in contexts with geographical or structural limitations. The range of benefits observed in the analyzed studies aligns with findings from previous reviews, such as that by Ekeland et al. (2010), which highlights its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness across various medical specialties. (6,7)

One of the main findings was telemedicine’s ability to reduce unnecessary referrals, as demonstrated by Gonçalves et al. (2023) in the context of teleneurology in Brazil’s Unified Health System, thereby saving resources and improving the quality of care. (10) This type of direct impact on the efficiency of the healthcare system reaffirms the transformative potential of digital health technologies.

Regarding the economic impact, several authors agree that the proper implementation of telemedicine programs can generate significant savings for the healthcare system by reducing hospitalizations, transfers, and unnecessary in-person consultations. (8,9) These advantages, however, require strategic planning that includes initial investments in technological infrastructure and professional training.

However, the review also identified a series of structural and organizational barriers that hinder the full adoption of telemedicine. Difficulties with interoperability between systems, lack of access to technology in rural areas, low digital literacy among some patients and professionals, and resistance to change were repeatedly highlighted. (12) These barriers, while surmountable, require robust public policies, inter-institutional integration, and ongoing awareness-raising and training processes.

Another critical aspect identified was the absence or fragmentation of regulatory frameworks governing telemedicine. The lack of legal clarity on medical liability, data protection, and the validity of electronic prescriptions compromises the safety of remote medical care. (7) This is particularly relevant in countries where healthcare legislation has not yet been fully adapted to new digital modalities.

Regarding the doctor-patient relationship, the results reveal a tension between the operational benefits of virtual care and the perceived risks of dehumanization. While some studies suggest that telemedicine could weaken the therapeutic bond due to the lack of physical contact and nonverbal cues, other studies highlight its ability to empower patients, promote their autonomy, and facilitate active monitoring of their clinical condition. (8,10) This suggests that the impact on the care relationship depends more on the quality of the implemented system and the level of professional training than on the modality itself.

Furthermore, recent studies, such as those by Rodrigues Neves and Djament (2023), highlight that telemedicine, combined with mobile technologies and digital platforms, has also proven effective in the treatment of chronic diseases such as obesity. This systematic review showed that patients who accessed telehealth programs, including videoconferencing and monitoring apps, achieved greater weight loss and better treatment adherence than those who received only conventional care. These results reinforce the potential of telemedicine not only to improve accessibility but also to promote sustainable lifestyle changes and improved management of conditions with high health prevalence. (13)

The findings of this review underscore the need to view telemedicine not as an end in itself, but as a complementary tool within an integrated, patient-centered care network. Its implementation must consider not only technical aspects, but also sociocultural contexts, ethical frameworks, and the user experience. Only then will it be possible to achieve effective, equitable, and sustainable integration of telemedicine into clinical practice?

CONCLUSION

This systematic review demonstrated that telemedicine has established itself as a key tool for transforming health systems, offering concrete benefits in terms of accessibility, operational efficiency, cost reduction, and continuity of clinical care, especially in contexts with structural or geographic limitations.

It was demonstrated that its application can optimize resource use, reduce unnecessary referrals, strengthen care for chronic diseases, and expand access to medical specialties in regions with a shortage of trained professionals. Furthermore, during the COVID-19 pandemic, its essential role as a rapid and effective health response strategy was confirmed.

However, its full implementation still faces significant challenges, including cultural resistance to change, the digital divide between urban and rural regions, the lack of interoperability among systems, and the absence of consolidated regulatory frameworks that ensure the safety, confidentiality, and legality of remote medical procedures.

Therefore, telemedicine should not be viewed as a standalone solution, but rather as a complementary strategy within a patient-centered, ethical, inclusive, and evidence-based care model. Its effectiveness will depend on proper planning, investment in technological infrastructure, ongoing training for healthcare professionals, and the development of specific regulations to support its evolution.

Future studies should focus on evaluating the longitudinal impact of telemedicine, considering quality indicators, clinical outcomes, user satisfaction, and economic sustainability. Only through a comprehensive approach will it be possible to establish telemedicine as a fundamental pillar of 21st-century healthcare systems.

References

1. 1 Alonso R, Eizaguirre MB, López P, Silva B, Rojas JI, Sinay V, et al. Argentinean consensus recommendations for the use of telemedicine in clinical practice in adult people with multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 2023;44:667–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06471-4..
2. 2 Bowman MA, Seehusen DA, Britz J, Ledford CJW. Clinical and Practice Innovation Improving the Practice of Family Medicine. J Am Board Fam Med 2024;37:357–9. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240144R0..
3. 3 Duiverman ML, Ribeiro C, Tonia T, Hazenberg A, van Meerloo S, van Meerloo H, et al. European Respiratory Society clinical practice guideline on telemedicine in home mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J 2025;66:2500094. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00094-2025..
4. 4 Gellad ZF, Diamond S, Crockett SD, Cross RK. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Telemedicine in Gastroenterology: Commentary. Gastroenterology 2023;164:690–5. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2022.12.043..
5. 5 Gordon ER, Trager MH, Kontos D, Weng C, Geskin LJ, Dugdale LS, et al. Ethical considerations for artificial intelligence in dermatology: a scoping review. Br J Dermatol 2024;190:789–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae040..
6. 6 Jhaveri D, Emeto TI, Alele FO, Strom A, Benham H. Use of telemedicine for rheumatology practice in Queensland, Australia: experiences before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intern Med J 2022;52:1685–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.15706..
7. 7 Jones EC, Kummer BR, Wilkinson JR. Teleneurology and Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2024;30:904–14. https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000001430..
8. 8 Liang LW, Kalia I, Latif F, Waase MP, Shimada YJ, Sayer G, et al. The use of telemedicine in cardiogenetics clinical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2022;10:e1946. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1946..
9. 9 Loeb S. Engaging in Clinical Research and Practice Approaches that Reduce Environmental Impact. Eur Urol Oncol 2024;7:1451–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.007..
10. 10 Monteiro IR, Moccia M. Mobile health interventions in multiple sclerosis: Bringing empowerment into clinical practice. Mult Scler 2023;29:1697–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585231214879..
11. 11 Mottet T, Hémar V, Enfedaque S, Mathoulin-Pélissier S, Charitansky H, Godbert Y, et al. Evaluating video-based consultations in routine clinical practice at a comprehensive cancer center. Acta Oncol 2023;62:1905–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2278758..
12. 12 Nguyen AD, White SJ, Tse T, Cartmill JA, Roger P, Hatem S, et al. Communication during telemedicine consultations in general practice: perspectives from general practitioners and their patients. BMC Prim Care 2024;25:324. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02576-1..
13. 13 Ohannessian R, Oganesyan T, Gevorgyan A, Chaltikyan G, Terzan L, Hovhannisyan M. Telemedicine is now legal in Armenia, how to make it a routine clinical practice? J Public Health Policy 2024;45:799–802. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-024-00512-2..
14. 14 Ostberg N, Ip W, Brown I, Li R. Impact of telemedicine on clinical practice patterns for patients with chest pain in the emergency department. Int J Med Inform 2022;161:104726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104726..
15. 15 Puchades R, Said-Criado I. Telemedicine in clinical practice: Barriers and risks. Med Clin (Barc) 2024;162:123–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2023.10.012..
16. 16 Robbins CL, Ford ND, Hayes DK, Ko JY, Kuklina E, Cox S, et al. Clinical Practice Changes in Monitoring Hypertension Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am J Hypertens 2022;35:596–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpac049..
17. 17 Tsou C, Robinson S, Boyd J, Jamieson A, Blakeman R, Yeung J, et al. Effectiveness of Telehealth in Rural and Remote Emergency Departments: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2021;23:e30632. https://doi.org/10.2196/30632..
18. 18 van Tubergen A, Hermans K. The Use of Mobile Health Apps in Clinical Practice Remains Challenging. J Rheumatol 2022;49:861–3. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.220476..
19. 19 Wahezi SE, Kohan LR, Spektor B, Brancolini S, Emerick T, Fronterhouse JM, et al. Telemedicine and current clinical practice trends in the COVID-19 pandemic. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2021;35:307–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.005..
20. 20 Xu S, Li Y, Ye J, Han D. Sleep medicine in China: current clinical practice. J Clin Sleep Med 2023;19:2125–31. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.10784..
21. 21 Sabbatini RM. A Telemedicina no Brasil: Evolução e Perspectivas. ResearchGate. Em 2012.
22. 22 Cesar FIG, de Freitas Moura E, Kanashiro Makiya eda, de Camargo Dias V. Evolução Da Telemedicina No Cenario Mundial: Importante Paralelo Ao Quadro Brasileiro. An Congr Nac Excel Em Gest. 2022;
23. 23 Martins CP, Bocage Santos Pinto C. O uso da telemedicina na atenção primária pós-pandemia da covid-19: Perspect Exp E Clínicas Inovações Bioméd E Educ Em Saúde PECIBES. 2023;9(1):18–24.
24. 24 S. Pedrotti, CH, D. Accorsi, TA, De Amicis Lima K, A. Morbeck, R, Cordioli E. Telemedicina: um pouco de história antes do crescimento exponencial durante a pandemia de Covid-19. Revista de Medicina USP. 2020.
25. 25 Boccuto F, Vizza P, De Rosa S, Tradigo G, Veltri P, Torella D, et al. How Patients Feel with Telemedicine Devices as an Enabling Factor for Personalised Medicine: A Preliminary Study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 23 de maio de 2024;314:168–72.
26. 26 Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews. 2010.
27. 27 Luz PL da. Telemedicina e a Relação Médico-Paciente. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019;113:100-102.
28. 28 Araújo MS, Brito MBR de, Pessoa LTS, Cadête MLX, Marques EJG, Coelho LNL, et al. IMPACTO DA TELEMEDICINA NA PRESTAÇÃO DE CUIDADOS DE SAÚDE: DESAFIOS E OPORTUNIDADES. Rev Ibero-Am Humanidades Ciênc E Educ. 31 de agosto de 2023;9(8):1300–6.
29. 29 Pedro de Oliveira AR. A Telemedicina Como um Novo Modelo na Prestação de Cuidados na Saúde Pública: Implementação em Angola. 2024.
30. 30 Gonçalves RF, Giovanini AF, Nascimento GB do, Isolan GR, Sigwalt MF, Polanski JF. IMPACTO DA UTILIZAÇÃO DA TELENEUROLOGIA NA REDUÇÃO DE ENCAMINHAMENTOS NO SISTEMA ÚNICO DE SAÚDE. SciELO; 2023.
31. 31 Ma Y, Zhao C, Zhao Y, Lu2 J, Jiang H, Cao Y, et al. Telemedicine application in patients with chronic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2022.
32. 32 de Arteche, M, Welsh SV, Santucci M, Carrillo E. Telemedicina en latinoamerica: caso Argentina, Bolivia y Colombia. Revista Venezola de Gerencia. 91. 955-975.
33. 33 Rodrigues Neves V, Djament L. Benefits of the use of telemedicine in patients with obesity: A systematic review. Gamification Augment Real. 2023;1:4.