SAP Primary Care
SAP Primary Care

Pharmacological management of gestational diabetes

Andreynna Laryssa Costa Almeida1 , Marcelo Adrian Estrin1
1Universidad Abierta Interamericana, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

https://doi.org/10.62486/pc202514

PDF XML

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that metformin achieves glycemic control comparable to insulin and is associated with lower weight gain and a reduced risk of maternal hypoglycemia; however, it presents a greater need for insulin rescue. Nevertheless, metformin may be associated with higher therapeutic failure rates requiring rescue insulin. Glyburide presents the least favorable risk–benefit profile, potentially being associated with worse neonatal outcomes, such as hypoglycemia and macrosomia, compared with metformin or insulin. Objective: To synthesize current evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of insulin, metformin, and glyburide in the management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM). Methods: A systematic search was conducted in databases (PubMed/PMC, ScienceDirect, MDPI) to identify recent systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials (2018–2025). Study selection was guided by PICO criteria and followed PRISMA methodology. Maternal outcomes (glycemic control, weight gain, hypoglycemia) and neonatal outcomes (macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care unit admission) were evaluated. Results: 11 studies that met the search criteria were included. According to the findings obtained, the systematic review provided a more detailed overview of the evidence. Recent data confirm the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment in gestational diabetes, highlighting primarily the use of metformin as a valid alternative to insulin due to its good adherence and lower cost. Insulin remains the reference treatment, especially in cases with poor glycemic control. In contrast, glyburide shows a higher maternal and neonatal risk. Long-term research is required to assess the metabolic effects on offspring exposed to metformin during pregnancy. Conclusion: Metformin emerges as an effective, short-term safe, and patient-preferred option, representing a first-line alternative to standard insulin therapy.

Keywords

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, Metformin, Insulin, Glyburide

INTRODUCTION

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is recognized as an impairment of glucose tolerance first diagnosed during pregnancy, in accordance with the guidelines of the WHO and the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG). (1,2) This concept describes a transient but clinically relevant condition that requires timely diagnosis and adequate metabolic control.

The initial therapeutic approach is invariably nutritional therapy and increased physical activity. If these conservative measures fail to achieve optimal glycemic control within a reasonable timeframe, pharmacological intervention is required. (3)

Pharmacological options can be prioritized as follows:

Insulin: The traditional "gold standard." Its safety stems from its inability to cross the placental barrier in significant amounts. Disadvantages include the complexity of administration (injections), higher cost, and a potential association with greater maternal weight gain. (4,5)

Oral Agents: The use of oral antidiabetics, primarily metformin (Category B) and glyburide (Category C, sulfonylurea), has grown due to their convenience, cost, and patient acceptance. (6) Concerns center on their placental transfer and the unknown long-term impact. (2)

The need to clarify the optimal therapeutic approach in light of the proliferation of comparative studies justifies this review. The objective of this study is to synthesize the evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of different pharmacological agents in the management of GDM.(7,8)

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

During pregnancy, the progressive increase in placental lactogen, cortisol, progesterone, and estrogens induces physiological insulin resistance. This adaptation promotes glucose availability for the fetus; however, in women with metabolic susceptibility, the pancreatic beta-cell response is insufficient, leading to gestational hyperglycemia. The combination of reduced peripheral sensitivity and a relative defect in insulin secretion explains the rise in blood glucose levels in the second and third trimesters, with a direct impact on fetal growth and the risk of complications. (1,8)

This alteration is associated with additional mechanisms, including decreased incretin action (GLP-1 and GIP), the establishment of a chronic low-grade inflammatory state, increased oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction, which impair insulin signaling in skeletal muscle, the liver, and adipose tissue, genetic, and epigenetic factors may predispose to this response, while obesity and excess free fatty acids amplify peripheral insulin resistance. The result is maternal hyperglycemia, which causes fetal hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia, promoting macrosomia and increasing the risk of metabolic complications for both mother and child. (2,9)

RISK FACTORS AND COMPLICATIONS

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus is associated with multiple predisposing factors of maternal, metabolic, and environmental origin. Early detection during prenatal care enables targeted preventive interventions and reduces perinatal morbidity.

Some risk factors may be exogenous, maternal, pregnancy-related, familial, or spousal in origin, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Risk factors associated with gestational diabetes mellitus.

Exogenous

Sedentary lifestyle, smoking, use of hyperglycemic medications.

Maternal

Advanced maternal age, obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, hypertension, excessive weight gain during pregnancy.

Pregnancy-related

Multiple pregnancy, polyhydramnios.

Family

Family history of diabetes mellitus.

Spouse

Partner with obesity or type 2 diabetes, shared unhealthy habits.

Once the disease is diagnosed or the presence of relevant risk factors for its onset is identified, it is necessary to act quickly to prevent or treat it appropriately, as it can lead to numerous complications for both the mother and the fetus. As described earlier, these complications can cause the pregnant woman to develop medium- to long-term metabolic and obstetric complications.

Some of the mentioned complications affect both the mother and the fetus, as described in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

DIAGNOSIS

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is defined as an impaired glucose tolerance first diagnosed during pregnancy, in accordance with WHO and IADPSG guidelines. (1,2) This concept describes a transient but clinically relevant condition that requires timely diagnosis and adequate metabolic control.

Diagnosis is based primarily on the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), performed between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation, using the defined cut-off points for fasting blood glucose, at 1 and 2 hours, according to current international criteria.

However, the authors note considerable heterogeneity in the screening protocols and diagnostic criteria applied in the included primary trials, which hinders the comparability of results and limits the extrapolation of conclusions to broader populations. (7,8)

Some studies specify post-diagnostic treatment goals—for example, fasting blood glucose levels of ≤ 90–100 mg/dL and postprandial levels of ≤ 120–126 mg/dL—although these values refer to treatment management, not to the initial diagnosis.(1,2)

The reviewed studies agree that the timely detection of hyperglycemia during pregnancy is essential to prevent perinatal complications and optimize maternal-fetal outcomes.

PREVENTION

In the analyzed articles, primary prevention of GD (preventing its onset) is not the central focus of the reviewed evidence. Instead, most studies focus on preventing complications once the diagnosis has been established, which corresponds to a secondary prevention approach. (1,2)

Several systematic reviews maintain that maintaining strict glycemic control is the most effective intervention for reducing maternal-fetal complications, particularly macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, the need for intensive care admission, and preeclampsia. (10)

In this context, pharmacological treatments other than insulin—particularly metformin—are associated with comparable or superior maternal-fetal outcomes and lower maternal weight gain, while maintaining safety and glycemic control efficacy. (2,10)

The network systematic review in BMC Endocrine Disorders (2021) ranks metformin as the option with the highest probability of therapeutic success and the lowest risk of neonatal complications, reinforcing its role in secondary prevention within the management of GDM.(7)

Table 2. Secondary prevention methods (pharmacological segment and fetal complications)

Category

Main Strategies

Pharmacological

Metformin treatment as a safe alternative to insulin; reduces macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, and preeclampsia, while maintaining efficacy in glycemic control.

Prevention of r fetal complications

Frequent obstetric and ultrasound monitoring, early therapeutic adjustment, and scheduled delivery based on metabolic control and fetal growth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The protocol for this review was developed in accordance with the PRISMA statement.

Eligibility Criteria (PICO):

Population (P): Pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus.

Intervention/Comparison (I and C): Insulin vs. Metformin, Insulin vs. Gliburide, Metformin vs. Gliburide, or combination therapy.(3,7)

Outcomes (O): Maternal (glycemic control, glycated hemoglobin, weight gain, maternal hypoglycemia, risk of hypertensive disorders) and Neonatal (macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit [NICU], preterm birth).(4)

Search Strategy: Searches were conducted in databases (PubMed/PMC, ScienceDirect, MDPI, etc.) using a predefined combination of keywords (e.g., metformin, insulin, glyburide, gestational diabetes, systematic review).

Selection and Data Extraction: The process of screening articles and extracting outcome data was performed in a standardized and independent manner by two reviewers (if applicable to your thesis), ensuring the integrity of the information.

Risk of Bias Assessment: The methodological quality of the primary studies, primarily randomized controlled trials (RCTs), was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0) (or the instrument you use), ensuring the validity of the synthesized evidence.

This systematic review included articles that met the inclusion criteria and also the exclusion criteria, as shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Inclusion and exclusion criteria (systematic review – GDM)

Table 1.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Articles published in peer-reviewed scientific journals between 2018 and 2025.

Studies or articles published outside the established period (2018–2025).

Open, full, and free access to the text of the selected articles.

Works that do not provide full access to the text, or that only present abstracts or partial excerpts.

Studies analyzing pharmacological treatments for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), including comparisons between insulin, metformin, and glyburide, either as monotherapy or in combination.

Studies with insufficient methodology or without a direct comparison between pharmacological treatments.

Articles addressing the comprehensive management of GDM and reporting maternal and neonatal clinical outcomes, such as glycemic control, macrosomia, or neonatal hypoglycemia.

Duplicate publications, narrative reviews without systematic analysis.

RESULTS

Recent scientific evidence consistently supports the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatment for gestational diabetes mellitus, highlighting the clinical and academic importance of the topic.

The literature review allowed for the collection of up-to-date and relevant information, with the aim of identifying the most effective and safe therapeutic strategies for glycemic control during pregnancy.

It provides a comprehensive overview of the different pharmacological alternatives available, as well as their maternal and neonatal implications.

In total, eleven scientific articles that met the pre-established selection criteria were included. The results were organized and classified by year, study title, and research objectives (see Table 4).

Table 4 – Studies included in the systematic review

Table 1.

No.

Title

Publication date

Authors

Objective

1

Metformin versus insulin in gestational diabetes: a systematic review.

September 9, 2024

Giovanna Noronha Berti, Igor Gutschov Oviedo Garcia, João Pedro Ruas Floriano de Toledo, Júlia Rodrigues Tatemoto, Lais Watanabe Marino, Mariana de Medeiros Legori, Sérgio Floriano de Toledo

To evaluate the use of metformin, alone or in combination with insulin, compared to insulin alone for the treatment of gestational diabetes, analyzing maternal and neonatal outcomes.

2

Efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for gestational diabetes: a systematic review comparing metformin with glibenclamide and insulin.

March 2025

Louise Bodier, Maela Le Lous, Hélène Isly, Christèle Derrien, Patricia Vaduva

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments used in gestational diabetes, comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with metformin, glibenclamide, and insulin.

3

Cardiometabolic outcomes in children of women treated with metformin versus insulin for gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

September 2024

Dimple Rawat, Yashdeep Gupta, Arun Kumar Yadav, Manoj Kumar Tembhre, Priyanka Das, Saisree Bakkireddy, Neeta Singh, K. Aparna Sharma, Rinchen Zangmo, Avdhesh Chandra, Ashish Datt Upadhyay, Deepali Garg

To investigate the impact of two pharmacological interventions (metformin and insulin) on cardiometabolic outcomes in the children of women with gestational diabetes.

4

Metformin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: What have we learned over the past two decades? Systematic review.

January 20, 2025

Angeliki Gerede, Ekaterini Domali, Christos Chatzakis, Chrysoula Margioula-Siarkou, Stamatios Petousis, Sofoklis Stavros, Konstantinos Nikolettos, Evanthia Gouveri, Sotirios Sotiriou, Panagiotis Tsikouras, Konstantinos Dinas, Nikolaos Nikolettos, Nikolaos Papanas, Dimitrios G. Goulis, Alexandros Sotiriadis

To analyze the evidence published over the past 20 years regarding the efficacy and safety of metformin compared with insulin or other drugs for the treatment of gestational diabetes.

5

Meta-analysis of the use of metformin and insulin on maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes.

December 2024

Rui Wu, Qingqing Zhang, Zuojing Li

To compare the effect of treatment with metformin versus insulin on maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes.

6

Use of insulin during gestational and pre-existing diabetes in pregnancy: a systematic review of study designs.

March 18, 2024

Kristin Castorino, Beatrice Osumili, Theophilus Lakiang, Kushal Kumar Banerjee, Andrea Goldyn, Carolina Piras de Oliveira

To analyze the available evidence on the use of insulin in pregnancy (gestational and pre-existing diabetes), evaluating methodological designs and reported clinical outcomes.

7

Long-term impact on offspring (ages 5 to 11 years) of metformin use during pregnancy in mothers with diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

June 12, 2024

Deep Dutta, Meha Sharma, Lakshmi Nagendra, Saptarshi Bhattacharya, Ritin Mohindra, Chittaranjan S. Yajnik

To assess the long-term impact (5–11 years) of metformin use during pregnancy in mothers with gestational or pre-existing diabetes, analyzing anthropometric and metabolic parameters.

8

Comparative efficacy and safety of glyburide, , metformin, and insulin in the treatment of gestational diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

March 18, 2022

Jing Lin, Rong-zu Tu, Xun-yu Hong

To establish a protocol for comparing the efficacy and safety of treatment with glyburide, metformin, and insulin in gestational diabetes through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

9

Metformin versus glyburide in the treatment and management of gestational diabetes: systematic review with meta-analysis.

February 16, 2022

Marina Martins de Oliveira, Kayan Felipe de Oliveira Andrade, Giovanni Henrique Silva Lima, Thiago Casali Rocha

To compare the clinical outcomes of metformin and glibenclamide use in gestational diabetes, evaluating efficacy, safety, and maternal and neonatal effects.

10

Metformin is comparable to insulin as a pharmacological treatment for gestational diabetes: a network meta-analysis evaluating 6,046 women.

May 2021

Omran A.H. Musa, Asma Syed, Aisha M. Mohamed, Tawanda Chivese, Justin Clark, Luis Furuya-Kanamori, Chang Xu, Egon Toft, Mohammed Bashir, Abdul Badi Abou-Samra, Lukman Thalib, Suhail A. Doi

Comparing the efficacy of metformin and glyburide versus insulin in the treatment of gestational diabetes using a network meta-analysis.

11

Glycemic control and neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes treated with glyburide, metformin, or insulin: a paired and network meta-analysis.

May 25, 2018

David C. D. Barrett, Yingtian Hu, Jiwon Park, Lena M. Olsrud, Chao Song, Linda S. A. Oude-Luttikhuis, Sivamurthy Padmanabhan

To compare the impact of glyburide, metformin, and insulin on maternal glycemic control and neonatal outcomes in gestational diabetes.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this review, based on the synthesis of multiple recent meta-analyses, reinforce the role of metformin as a safe and effective alternative to insulin for the pharmacological treatment of GDM. (7,11) The practical and logistical advantages of metformin are notable, including the convenience of oral administration, which improves patient adherence, and a considerable reduction in costs compared with insulin. (6)

Insulin remains the gold standard of care and is irreplaceable in patients with poor initial glycemic control or in whom metformin fails, as it is the only medication that ensures the fetus is not exposed to significant concentrations of an antidiabetic drug. (4,9)

Glibenclamide is consistently less favored in clinical guidelines due to its association with a higher risk profile for the mother (hypoglycemia) and the newborn (macrosomia). (1,6,7)

The primary concern and a crucial area for future research is the longitudinal follow-up of offspring exposed to metformin in utero. It is essential to evaluate its long-term impact on the risk of obesity and T2D in 5- to 10-year follow-up cohorts to make fully informed clinical decisions. (6,9)

CONCLUSION

This systematic review confirms the importance of pharmacological treatment in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and updates our understanding of available therapeutic management.

Metformin stands out as a safe and effective option, with glycemic control similar to that of insulin and additional advantages, such as less weight gain, lower risk of hypoglycemia, and better adherence due to its oral administration and low cost.

Insulin remains the standard of care for cases of poor metabolic control or metformin treatment failure, while glyburide has a less favorable profile and is recommended with caution.

The need for new longitudinal studies evaluating the long-term effects of fetal exposure to metformin is emphasized to ensure the safety and optimize future therapeutic strategies.

References

  1. 1 Berti GN, Garcia IGO, Toledo JPRFD, Tatemoto JR, Marino LW, Legori MDM, et al. Metformin versus insulin in gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Rev Bras Ginecol E Obstetrícia. 4 de dezembro de 2024;46:e-rbgo89.
  2. 2 Gerede A, Domali E, Chatzakis C, Margioula-Siarkou C, Petousis S, Stavros S, et al. Metformin for Treating Gestational Diabetes: What Have We Learned During the Last Two Decades? A Systematic Review. Life. 20 de janeiro de 2025;15(1):130.
  3. 3 Musa OAH, Syed A, Mohamed AM, Chivese T, Clark J, Furuya-Kanamori L, et al. Metformin is comparable to insulin for pharmacotherapy in gestational diabetes mellitus: A network meta-analysis evaluating 6046 women. Pharmacol Res. maio de 2021;167:105546.
  4. 4 Castorino K, Osumili B, Lakiang T, Banerjee KK, Goldyn A, Piras De Oliveira C. Insulin Use During Gestational and Pre-existing Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Study Design. Diabetes Ther. maio de 2024;15(5):929–1045.
  5. 5 Lin J, Tu R zu, Hong X yu. Comparative efficacy and safety of glyburide, metformin, and insulin in treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) [Internet]. 18 de março de 2022 [citado 2 de novembro de 2025];101(11). Disponível em: https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/MD.0000000000029090
  6. 6 Yu DQ, Xu GX, Teng XY, Xu JW, Tang LF, Feng C, et al. Glycemic control and neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus treated using glyburide, metformin, or insulin: a pairwise and network meta-analysis.
  7. 7 Bodier L, Le Lous M, Isly H, Derrien C, Vaduva P. Efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments for gestational diabetes: a systematic review comparing metformin with glibenclamide and insulin. Diabetes Metab. março de 2025;51(2):101622.
  8. 8 Oliveira MMD, Andrade KFDO, Lima GHS, Rocha TC. Metformin versus glyburide in treatment and control of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Einstein São Paulo. 2 de fevereiro de 2022;20:eRW6155.
  9. 9 Dutta D, Sharma M, Nagendra L, Bhattacharya S, Mohindra R, Yajnik CS. Long-Term Impact on Offspring (5 to 11 Years of Age) of Metformin Use in Pregnancy in Mothers With Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Endocr Pract. setembro de 2024;30(9):854–62.
  10. 10 Rawat D, Gupta Y, Yadav AK, Tembhre MK, Das P, Bakkireddy S, et al. Cardiometabolic outcomes in offspring of women treated with metformin versus insulin for gestational diabetes: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. setembro de 2024;18(9):103134.
  11. 11 Wu R, Zhang Q, Li Z. A meta-analysis of metformin and insulin on maternal outcome and neonatal outcome in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2 de janeiro de 2024;37(1):2295809.
  12. 12 Antar SA, Ashour NA, Sharaky M, Khattab M, Ashour NA, Zaid RT, et al. Diabetes mellitus: Classification, mediators, and complications; A gate to identify potential targets for the development of new effective treatments. Biomed Pharmacother 2023;168:115734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115734..
  13. 13 Assani M-Z, Boldeanu L, Manolea M-M, Boldeanu MV, Siloși I, Assani A-D, et al. From Molecular Insights to Clinical Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus-A Narrative Review. Int J Mol Sci 2025;26:8719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178719..
  14. 14 Benhalima K, Beunen K, Siegelaar SE, Painter R, Murphy HR, Feig DS, et al. Management of type 1 diabetes in pregnancy: update on lifestyle, pharmacological treatment, and novel technologies for achieving glycaemic targets. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2023;11:490–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00116-X..
  15. 15 Cando LFT, Quebral EPB, Ong EP, Catral CDM, Relador RJL, Velasco AJD, et al. Current status of diabetes mellitus care and management in the Philippines. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2024;18:102951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2024.102951..
  16. 16 Dubois N, Giroux I. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Efficacy of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Management and Prevention. Healthcare (Basel) 2025;13:2261. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182261..
  17. 17 Gonzalez-Lopez C, Wojeck BS. Role of metformin in the management of type 2 diabetes: recent advances. Pol Arch Intern Med 2023;133:16511. https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.16511..
  18. 18 Gupta M, Liti B, Barrett C, Thompson PD, Fernandez AB. Prevention and Management of Hypertriglyceridemia-Induced Acute Pancreatitis During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Am J Med 2022;135:709–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.12.006..
  19. 19 Ikwuanusi E, Yafai I, Emovon E. The Impact of Conservative Versus Pharmacological Management on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2025;17:e94610. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.94610..
  20. 20 Jiang L, Tang K, Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Ekeroma A, Li X, et al. A global view of hypertensive disorders and diabetes mellitus during pregnancy. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2022;18:760–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-022-00734-y..
  21. 21 Kunarathnam V, Vadakekut ES, Mahdy H. Gestational Diabetes. StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026.
  22. 22 Lachaud A, Durnwald C. Update on Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and the Role of Continuous Glucose Monitor Technology. Diabetes Technol Ther 2025;27:873–80. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2025.0148..
  23. 23 Luo Q-J, Ni Q. Life-course management of gestational diabetes mellitus: A narrative review. World J Clin Cases 2025;13:111096. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v13.i29.111096..
  24. 24 Mittal R, Prasad K, Lemos JRN, Arevalo G, Hirani K. Unveiling Gestational Diabetes: An Overview of Pathophysiology and Management. Int J Mol Sci 2025;26:2320. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26052320..
  25. 25 Nakshine VS, Jogdand SD. A Comprehensive Review of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Impacts on Maternal Health, Fetal Development, Childhood Outcomes, and Long-Term Treatment Strategies. Cureus 2023;15:e47500. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47500..
  26. 26 Nguyen HG, Nguyen KTH, Nguyen PN. Non-Pharmacological Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus with a High Fasting Glycemic Parameter: A Hospital-Based Study in Vietnam. J Clin Med 2024;13:5895. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195895..
  27. 27 Osinga JAJ, Derakhshan A, Karachaliou M, Poppe KG, Warringa L, Verdonk K, et al. Association of gestational thyroid function and thyroid autoimmunity with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and individual participant meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2025;13:651–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(25)00068-3..
  28. 28 Oskovi-Kaplan ZA, Ozgu-Erdinc AS. Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Adv Exp Med Biol 2021;1307:257–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2020_552..
  29. 29 Pigato F, Candido R, Zanette G, Zamagni G, Trojniak MP, Brunato B, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus: Impact of adherence on patient management and maternal-neonatal complications. Prim Care Diabetes 2023;17:486–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2023.07.003..
  30. 30 Raets L, Ingelbrecht A, Benhalima K. Management of type 2 diabetes in pregnancy: a narrative review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023;14:1193271. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1193271..
  31. 31 Wong ND, Budoff MJ, Ferdinand K, Graham IM, Michos ED, Reddy T, et al. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment: An American Society for Preventive Cardiology clinical practice statement. Am J Prev Cardiol 2022;10:100335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100335..

Declarations

Funding

No financing.

Conflict of interest

None.

Authorship contributions

Drafting – original draft: Andreynna Laryssa Costa Almeida, Marcelo Adrian Estrin.

Writing–review and editing: Andreynna Laryssa Costa Almeida, Marcelo Adrian Estrin.

Citation copied