Freaks, Disasters and Recovery: Innovative Proposals for Social Intervention in Acapulco

INTRODUCTION

Acapulco, a coastal city on the Pacific Ocean, has historically been vulnerable to natural phenomena such as earthquakes and hurricanes. This condition has prompted multiple studies on risk and vulnerability. However, much of this research and the resulting public policies tend to homogenize the experiences of the population, without addressing the differentiated responses that emerge from specific social groups. Among these, the geek community, made up of people who share interests in pop culture, anime, video games, and other alternative expressions, has been systematically invisible in disaster response and recovery frameworks.

This study proposes to analyze the resilience strategies developed by the geek community in Acapulco in response to the impacts of hurricanes Otis and John. Far from assuming a passive stance, this group has deployed creative and collaborative practices that include support networks in physical and digital spaces, community organization, and the use of technologies for recovery and prevention to generate innovative solutions.

The main objective of this project is to propose an inclusive and culturally sensitive prevention strategy that recognizes the dynamics of the geek community and integrates them into risk management and recovery frameworks. Through a participatory and creative approach, the aim is not only to document their collective responses and experiences, but also to raise awareness among public and private institutions of the importance of including these groups in disaster adaptation and response processes.

The climate crisis from a comprehensive perspective

The climate crisis cannot be understood solely from the perspective of the natural sciences, as it is intrinsically linked to social, political, and economic dynamics. This human-environmental problem reflects how human decisions have generated global, invisible, and unevenly distributed risks, as Beck (1998) points out in his concept of the "risk society." Industrialization, excessive consumption, and technological expansion have created a series of dangers that are beyond the control of traditional institutions, revealing a profound environmental injustice.

For Giddens (2010), climate change is not only an environmental challenge but also a structural problem that requires transformations in institutions and public policies. These transformations must anticipate damage before it becomes irreversible, underscoring the need for intergenerational responsibility in the face of the crisis. In this sense, climate change is not an isolated natural phenomenon, but a direct consequence of the modern development dynamics that we have promoted.

Latour (2004) reinforces this view by proposing a politics of nature that integrates natural phenomena as political actors in interconnected networks, where humans, technologies, and ecosystems interact. Climate disasters are therefore manifestations of complex systems in which human decisions play a decisive role.

From a Latin American perspective, Leff (2006) criticizes the dominant view of nature as an exploitable resource and advocates a reconfiguration of the relationship between humanity and the environment grounded in ecological justice, respect for local knowledge, and sustainability. This perspective questions the foundations of modern development and promotes more inclusive and ethical models.

In short, the climate crisis is not an isolated or accidental phenomenon, but a direct consequence of human actions, the product of an unsustainable development model. Recognizing this crisis as a human-environmental crisis implies acknowledging the need for comprehensive solutions that address social justice, equitable mitigation and adaptation, and the incorporation of local knowledge into risk management.

Disasters: A social construct?

The theory of the social construction of disasters, proposed by Hewitt (1983), argues that disasters are not mere natural events, but social phenomena that emerge from the interaction between natural factors and pre-existing social structures. This view challenges the traditional conception of disasters as unpredictable events, showing that social, political, and economic conditions determine communities' vulnerability. In this context, Lavell (1993) and Oliver-Smith (1995) emphasize that disasters are not only the result of natural phenomena but also depend on factors such as poverty, inequality, and inadequate public policies, which amplify their impact.

The paradigm shift from a naturalistic to a social approach, beginning in the 1970s, made it possible to redefine the concepts of risk and vulnerability, which were no longer seen as attributes inherent to physical phenomena but rather understood as products of historical and structural processes. García Acosta (2004) developed this theoretical line in Latin America, emphasizing the relationship between disasters, political processes, collective memory, and the cultural dimension. In turn, Maskrey (1998) and Lavell (1999) proposed risk management models that integrate technical knowledge with popular knowledge, highlighting the importance of community participation.

The social approach has also made it possible to highlight that disasters do not affect everyone equally. According to Cardona (2001), the most vulnerable sectors, whether due to economic, geographical, or political factors, suffer greater losses and face greater obstacles in the recovery process. This analysis highlights the need to understand disasters as the result of the interaction between a natural hazard and pre-existing social conditions of vulnerability (UNDRR, 2015).

Finally, anthropology has played a fundamental role in the holistic understanding of disasters, not only by analyzing the physical damage, but also the social, cultural, and emotional meanings that they generate. According to Hoffman in an interview with Diaz (2017), anthropological studies highlight the resilience and agency of communities, allowing us to understand the symbolic processes that unfold before, during, and after disasters.

The social construction of disasters has transformed our understanding of these phenomena, recognizing them as deeply human processes whose vulnerability is determined by social, historical, and political decisions. This perspective has been key to the design of more inclusive and effective public policies in risk management.

Resilience: reconstruction beyond the physical

The concept of resilience has evolved from its origins in physics and ecology to become a key tool for understanding how communities cope, adapt, and transform after a disaster. In the context of Comprehensive Disaster Risk Management (CDRM), community resilience refers not only to the ability to withstand the impact of extreme events but also to the capacity to rebuild the affected social, emotional, and cultural fabric.

The social sciences recognize that resilience is not a return to normality, but a dynamic process that can generate structural transformations. Yncera (2019) highlights its collective and contextual nature, influenced by access to resources, social cohesion, and support networks. For its part, the UNDRR (2015) defines resilience as the ability to adapt and transform in the face of risk, with an emphasis on participatory and sustainable solutions.

In countries such as Mexico, post-disaster recovery, as in the earthquakes of 1985 and 2017 or Hurricane Otis (2023), has followed different trajectories, determined by structural and organizational factors. These processes underscore that resilience depends not only on infrastructure but also on recognizing local knowledge, cultural identities, and community practices that strengthen responses to crises.

In this sense, proposing innovative intervention strategies implies considering resilience as a profoundly social process, in which communities, including subcultures such as geek culture, articulate their own responses that deserve to be made visible, integrated, and empowered to move towards a more just and transformative recovery.

City, subcultures, and disasters: rethinking intervention from the margins

Within the analysis, it is essential to understand the city not only as a physical or territorial space, but also as a symbolic construction shaped by social, cultural, and affective practices (Reguillo, 1996). The city is the scene of multiple narratives, tensions, and exclusions, where meanings of belonging, visibility, and power are contested. According to Harvey (1998), contemporary urbanization has deepened processes of social fragmentation, weakening neighborhood ties and limiting collective responses to emergencies.

This fragmentation affects specific sectors unevenly, particularly those that do not fit into the normative frameworks of the dominant culture, such as urban subcultures. Far from being marginal deviations, these should be understood as legitimate forms of symbolic and cultural organization. From Geertz's (1987) perspective, subcultures are systems of shared meanings, with their own aesthetics, codes, values, and ways of life, that allow for the construction of identity and a sense of belonging. In Latin America, these subcultural expressions respond to contexts of inequality, exclusion, and resistance, functioning as cultural alternatives that give meaning to the urban experience.

In the context of disasters such as the one Acapulco experienced after Hurricane Otis, subcultures, such as the geek community, can play a crucial role. Their capacity for spontaneous organization, use of public space, and emotional bonds can become forms of community resilience that are not recognized institutionally. By including them in risk management and recovery strategies, innovative proposals can be developed that articulate networks of care, communication, and action grounded in cultural diversity.

Recognizing subcultures as social actors means going beyond the homogeneous approaches that dominate urban planning and post-disaster intervention. It means understanding that the city is experienced from multiple perspectives and that the margins also build social fabric.

The history of geeks in Acapulco

The geek community is made up of enthusiasts of comics, anime, video games, and pop culture who, since the 1990s, have sought spaces to express themselves and connect, despite being considered a stigmatized group. Its origins lie not in large conventions or social networks, but in small, low-profile gatherings, such as the radio program Comando Cómics and pioneering events where cosplay and geek identity began to take shape informally. For more than a decade, this community remained scattered and marginalized until 2010, when conventions were institutionalized, and physical and digital meeting points were created, strengthening their cohesion.

Geeks face processes of stigmatization, exclusion, and self-segregation, not as signs of apathy, but as strategies of protection and cultural affirmation in the face of social prejudices and exclusionary norms. Their experience shows that, far from being mere entertainment, geek culture is an engine of solidarity, social agency, and resilience, particularly empowered by digital networks that facilitate organization and mutual support.

Working with this community is relevant because their identity and practices offer an innovative and culturally sensitive approach to social intervention in vulnerable urban contexts. Recognizing their ability to create spaces for emotional support, self-management, and collective action opens new avenues for strengthening resilience and social inclusion in Acapulco.

METHODS

RESULTS

The research identified that the geek community in Acapulco, often perceived as marginal or disconnected from social problems, has excellent organizational, communicative, and emotional potential in emergencies. In the wake of Hurricane Otis and subsequent climatic events, this community emerged as a relevant actor in collective recovery processes, using its own cultural references as tools for coping and action.

The process began with spaces for dialogue and trust, both physical and virtual, which fostered the recognition of geek identity as an integral part of resilience processes. Through discussions, workshops, and activities at Friki Plaza, experiences, emotions, and knowledge regarding disasters were gathered. Collective SWOT analysis identified strengths such as creativity, a sense of community, and digital skills, as well as specific needs in mental health and prevention. At the same time, an exploratory survey revealed participants' genuine interest in getting involved in risk management processes through their own content.

The testimonies collected show that, after Hurricanes Otis and John, the community found emotional refuge in its geek culture. Fictional characters, readings, video games, illustrations, and symbolic coexistence with these references served as therapeutic tools. Instead of seeking formal psychological care, many young people processed the trauma through creativity, reaffirming their collective identity as a form of support. These practices also generated a shared narrative of the disaster, reinforcing emotional bonds and strengthening the sense of belonging.

The response to the hurricanes showed a clear evolution in the forms of participation. While Otis provoked spontaneous, unstructured reactions in the face of John's support, networks were consolidated, and, in Erick's case, which was not anticipated, preventive actions were put in place in advance. This progression reflects a process of collective learning, in which the community moved from emotional reaction to organized action. This strengthening led to greater risk awareness, the acquisition of technical skills, and a growing commitment to prevention.

One of the most significant achievements was the creation of the Frikis y Desastres (Geeks and Disasters) group on Facebook, which quickly became a mutual care network, a space for sharing experiences, an information channel, and a platform for digital activism. There, preventive recommendations were shared in accessible language, testimonies were documented, and collective initiatives were coordinated.

In addition, collaborative audiovisual content was developed in which the members themselves narrated their post-disaster experiences, linking them to their geek identity. These videos, disseminated on social media, raised awareness among other social sectors and built collective memory through emotion and creativity.

Training workshops were promoted in collaboration with strategic allies, including the Inter-American University for Development, Acapulco Campus (UNID), addressing topics such as the visible impact and historical context of disasters, as well as the use of technological tools such as Windy for climate monitoring. These activities consolidated technical knowledge, youth empowerment, and the articulation between popular culture and education for prevention.

The geek community in Acapulco has not only been a victim of disasters, but also a protagonist in its recovery. By recognizing and leveraging their cultural identity as a legitimate resource, it was possible to design innovative, culturally sensitive, and emotionally meaningful intervention strategies. This model demonstrates that it is possible to build community resilience from the symbolic, digital, and collective, opening replicable paths for other urban communities in vulnerable situations.

CONCLUSIONS

This research demonstrates that Acapulco's geek community, often stigmatized and socially invisible, has the organizational, emotional, and creative potential to cope with disasters. Based on hurricane analysis, it was identified that this urban subculture was not only a victim of the disaster but also an active agent in the recovery process.

The study is based on a comprehensive view of the climate crisis as a human-environmental phenomenon. It addresses disasters from their social dimension, recognizing that risk and vulnerability are unevenly distributed. In this context, the proposal focuses on a culturally sensitive, site-specific intervention that incorporates marginalized groups into prevention, response, and reconstruction strategies.

Through methods such as digital ethnography, participatory workshops, and social media analysis, forms of resilience based on geek identity were made visible. The use of cultural references, digital narratives, illustrations, and audiovisual content not only allowed for the channeling of trauma but also for the creation of support networks, the activation of self-management processes, and the generation of preventive content adapted to the language and codes of the community.

The creation of the Frikis y Desastres (Geeks and Disasters) Facebook group, the production of collaborative videos, and the organization of training workshops are concrete examples of how this community has articulated its participation from a symbolic, emotional, and collective perspective. These practices become innovative social intervention strategies that can be replicated in other vulnerable urban contexts.

In short, this research suggests that integrating geek culture into risk management and post-disaster recovery policies is not only possible but necessary. Recognizing its organizational capacity and its own forms of reconstruction provides a more humane, inclusive, and compelling vision of community resilience, strengthening the link between culture, sustainable development, and social transformation.

References

1. 1 Agbehadji IE, Schütte S, Masinde M, Botai J, Mabhaudhi T. Climate Risks Resilience Development: A Bibliometric Analysis of Climate-Related Early Warning Systems in Southern Africa. Climate 2024;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12010003..
2. 2 Akbari K, Yari A, Ostadtaghizadeh A. Nurses’ experiences of providing medical services during the Kermanshah earthquake in Iran: a qualitative study. BMC Emergency Medicine 2024;24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00920-9..
3. 3 Aksoy CG, Chupilkin M, Kóczán Z, Plekhanov A. Unearthing the impact of earthquakes: A review of economic and social consequences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2025;44:1450–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22642..
4. 4 Alon N, Macrynikola N, Jester DJ, Keshavan M, Reynolds CF, Saxena S, et al. Social determinants of mental health in major depressive disorder: Umbrella review of 26 meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Psychiatry Research 2024;335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115854..
5. 5 Ansari R, Liaqat MU, Grossi G. Improving flood and drought management in transboundary Upper Jhelum Basin-South Asia. Science of the Total Environment 2024;945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174044..
6. 6 Apud I. Repensar el método etnográfico: hacia una etnografía multitécnica, reflexiva y abierta al diálogo interdisciplinario. Antípoda. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología. 2013;16:215-235. https://doi.org/10.7440/antipoda16.2013.10
7. 7 Arslanli SE, Duru HA, Bakir E, Pulat P. Exploring the disaster experiences and psychosocial support needs of children affected by the Kahramanmaras earthquake in Turkey through drawing narratives. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 2024;78:e260–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2024.07.014..
8. 8 Asibey MO, Osei-Bonsu A, Agyekum S, Kpeebi Y. ‘Collective consciousness’ and urban informal action groups towards climate resilience. Cities 2026;171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106724..
9. 9 Barrett EL, Grummitt L, Jones S, Rowlinson K, Vasilopoulos F, Teesson M, et al. The prevalence of potentially traumatic events in childhood and associations with mental disorders, suicide and physical health in adulthood: An Australian nationally representative cross-sectional study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2026;60:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674251381004..
10. 10 Beck U. La sociedad del riesgo: hacia una nueva modernidad. Buenos Aires: Paidós; 1998.
11. 11 Bhanbhro S, Thellmann C, Memon ZA, Ahmed W, Ansar F, Ali S, et al. Interventions, adaptive strategies and best practices improving maternal nutritional health in changing climatic conditions and diverse cultural contexts in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2025;15. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107469..
12. 12 Bourdieu P. La distinción: criterio y bases sociales del gusto. Madrid: Taurus; 2011.
13. 13 Brandt L, Adorjan K, Catthoor K, Chkonia E, Falkai P, Fiorillo A, et al. Climate change and mental health: Position paper of the European Psychiatric Association. European Psychiatry 2024;67. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1754..
14. 14 Calle Muller C, ElZomor M. The Need for Mental Health Guidelines to Strengthen Disaster Management Policy and Support Responders in Developing Countries. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction 2026;18. https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1457..
15. 15 Can Gür G. Shattered ground, resilient souls: examining coping strategies, social support, and earthquake exposure’s effects on post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms among adolescent and young adults survivors of the 2023 earthquake in Türkiye. Current Psychology 2024;43:21745–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05995-6..
16. 16 Cantini R, Cosentino C, Marozzo F, Talia D, Trunfio P. Harnessing prompt-based large language models for disaster monitoring and automated reporting from social media feedback. Online Social Networks and Media 2025;45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2024.100295..
17. 17 Canwat V. Social innovations and drivers in flood early warning systems: A community-based transboundary perspective from Elegu flood plain in Northern Uganda. vol. 18, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12930..
18. 18 Cardona O. La necesidad de repensar de manera holística los conceptos de vulnerabilidad y riesgo. Centro de Estudios sobre Desastres y Riesgos (CEDERI), Universidad de los Andes; 2001.
19. 19 Castro-Martínez A, Torres-Martín J-L, Villena-Alarcón E. When Authorities’ Response Fails and Citizens Act: Social Media Responses to the DANA Disaster in Spain. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 2025;16:980–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-025-00686-7..
20. 20 Chipangamate NS, Nwaila GT. Social innovation, ecological crises and creating mining host community resilience in Southern Africa. Extractive Industries and Society 2025;24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2025.101756..
21. 21 Choudhury M, Wu H, Shahidullah AKM. Improving the feedback loop between community- and policy-level learning: Building resilience of coastal communities in Bangladesh. Sustainable Development 2024;32:1508–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2686..
22. 22 Chu M, Song W, Zhao Z, Chen T, Chiang Y-C. Emotional contagion on social media and the simulation of intervention strategies after a disaster event: a modeling study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2024;11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03397-4..
23. 23 Civelek C. From state commodification to local reproduction of vulnerability: ethnographic insights from a Risk Zone Urban Renewal Project in Turkey. Disasters 2026;50. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.70024..
24. 24 Craig N, Haslam C, Cruwys T, Jetten J, Kellezi B, Macleod E, et al. ‘I’m Very Lucky Because This Is Even Better’: The Role of Social Identity Revitalisation in Recovery From Disaster. European Journal of Social Psychology 2025;55:1325–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.70016..
25. 25 Cruz-Sánchez Y, Aguilar-Estrada A, del Moral J, Monterroso Rivas AI. The availability of food in Mexico: an approach to measuring food security. Agriculture and Food Security 2024;13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-024-00484-2..
26. 26 Cvetković VM, Šišović V. Understanding the Sustainable Development of Community (Social) Disaster Resilience in Serbia: Demographic and Socio-Economic Impacts. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2024;16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072620..
27. 27 Darwish B, El Masri JE, Hourieh L, Nahas Z, Abou-Kheir W, Chamaa F. Nitrous oxide promotes exploratory activity and stimulates neurogenesis in a male rat model of post-traumatic stress disorder. Neuroscience 2026;593:96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.12.017..
28. 28 Díaz G. Antropología y desastres: Entrevista con Susanna Hoffma. CUHSO (Cultura-Hombre-Sociedad). 2017;27(2):251-258. https://doi.org/10.7770/cuhsov27n2-art1273
29. 29 Dikbıyık D, Alp S. Analyzing sentiment shifts in news coverage of occupational accidents: A case study of the Amasra mining disaster in Türkiye. Work 2026;83:122–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815251358271..
30. 30 Ekoh PC, Walsh CA. Valuable Beyond Vulnerable: A Scoping Review on the Contributions of Older Forced Migrants in Post-migration Recovery. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 2024;15:186–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00549-7..
31. 31 Filz P, Beas-Luna R, Rindi L, Lorda J, Freiwald J, Malpica‑Cruz L. Coastal resilience could be enhanced by co-interventions and synergistic Nature-based Solutions. Nature-Based Solutions 2025;8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100244..
32. 32 Fischer de la Vega LE. La subcultura friki en la Ciudad de México y su efecto mercadológico de consumo. En: Congreso Internacional de Ciencias Administrativas. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2021. p. 1-17. Disponible en: https://repositorios.fca.unam.mx/investigacion/memorias/2021/13.03.pdf
33. 33 Fuentes M, Cárdenas JP, Olivares G, Rasmussen E, Urbina C, Salazar S, et al. Harnessing network science for urban resilience: the CASA model’s approach to social and environmental challenges. Applied Network Science 2025;10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-025-00703-0..
34. 34 Fukurai M, Grant Ludwig L. Older Adults, Loneliness, and Earthquake Disaster Preparedness in Japan. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 2025;19. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2025.10273..
35. 35 García Acosta V. La perspectiva histórica en la antropología del riesgo y del desastre: acercamientos metodológicos. Relaciones. Estudios de Historia y Sociedad. 2004;XXV (97):124-142.
36. 36 Garcia-Batista ZE, Guerra-Peña K, Álvarez-Hernández A, Cano-Vindel A, Moretti L, Medrano LA. Post-traumatic stress, depression and anxiety following the jet set nightclub collapse: Evidence from a nationwide prospective study in the Dominican Republic. Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health 2025;12. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2025.10097..
37. 37 Geertz C. La interpretación de las culturas. Barcelona: Gedisa; 1987.
38. 38 Giddens A. La política del cambio climático. Madrid: Alianza Editorial; 2010.
39. 39 Glowka G, Eller R, Peters M, Zehrer A. Risk perception in small- and medium-sized hospitality family enterprises. Tourism Review 2025;80:1335–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-06-2023-0421..
40. 40 Gong C, Ren Y. The longitudinal relationships between misinformation sharing, fear of missing out and rumination among earthquake survivors: a cross-lagged panel network analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2025;12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05467-7..
41. 41 Gu T, Zhao H, Yue L, Guo J, Cui Q, Tang J, et al. Attribution analysis of urban social resilience differences under rainstorm disaster impact: Insights from interpretable spatial machine learning framework. Sustainable Cities and Society 2025;118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.106029..
42. 42 Güler A, Gül S, Yıldırım M. Social comparison, resilience, life satisfaction, depression, and anxiety among earthquake survivors in Turkey. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 2024;105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104426..
43. 43 Guo Y, Chang P-C, Liu S, Cai Q. How Role Overload Impacts Nurses’ Work Engagement in Healthcare Emergencies: A Moderated Mediation Model. International Nursing Review 2025;72. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.70125..
44. 44 Harvey D. La experiencia del espacio y el tiempo. En: La condición de la posmodernidad: una investigación sobre los orígenes del cambio cultural. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu; 1998. p. 225-356.
45. 45 Huamancaja J, Huamancaja R, Deza J, Anccasi C, Cutti K. Flood risk in an Andean Peruvian city: A risk evaluation and mitigation project proposal. Journal of Project Management (Canada) 2026;11:287–300. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.jpm.2025.9.004..
46. 46 Ibrahim AM, Hussein SA, Mohamed MO. Barriers and enablers to effective collaboration and coordination mechanisms among humanitarian organisations delivering health and nutrition programmes in Somalia: an exploratory qualitative study. BMJ Open 2025;15. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101401..
47. 47 Ibrahim A-S, Kuuire V, Kepe T. On mapping urban community resilience: Land use vulnerability, coping and adaptive strategies in Ghana. Journal of Environmental Management 2024;370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122426..
48. 48 Imkome E-U. Fear and Challenging Behaviour: A Phenomenological-Hermeneutic Study of Public Mass Shooting Attacks During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Thailand. Nursing Open 2026;13. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70398..
49. 49 Kabir S, Khan FM, Saha D. From relief shelters to self-organized communities: Building disaster resilience in coastal Bangladesh. Progress in Disaster Science 2025;28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100469..
50. 50 Kaplan V, Alkasaby M, Düken ME, Kaçkin Ö, Riad A. The impact of earthquakes on women: assessing women’s mental health in aftermath of the Kahramanmaraş-centred earthquake in Türkiye. Journal of Public Health 2024;46:e510–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdae059..
51. 51 Khan HTA, Addo KM, Findlay H. Public Health Challenges and Responses to the Growing Ageing Populations. Public Health Challenges 2024;3. https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.213..
52. 52 Khankeh HR, Farrokhi M, Hosseinabadi-Farahani M, Saatchi M, Ahmadi S, Roudini J, et al. Challenges of Social Trust in Disaster Management Focusing on COVID-19 in Iran: Recommendations for Gaining it Again. Health in Emergencies and Disasters Quarterly 2025;10:85–94. https://doi.org/10.32598/hdq.10.2.414.2..
53. 53 Kim K, Kang J-Y, Hwang C. Identifying Indicators Contributing to the Social Vulnerability Index via a Scoping Review. Land 2025;14. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14020263..
54. 54 Kitnarong N, Muangpaisan W, Kaweewongprasert P, Luerithiphong S, Apinuntavech S, Manaboriboon B, et al. Electronic health databases and surveys for community-specific health promotion, prevention, and interventions: the Bangkoknoi Model Project (BANMOP). BMC Health Services Research 2025;25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12837-z..
55. 55 Lam LM. Asymmetrical power relationships in disaster reduction remain the key barrier to sustainable recovery: Neoliberalism and Nepal’s post-earthquake recovery experiences. Sustainable Development 2024;32:1483–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2683..
56. 56 Latour B. Políticas de la naturaleza: cómo hacer ciencia en democracia. Buenos Aires: Paidós; 2004.
57. 57 Lavell A. Desastres durante una década: lecciones y avances conceptuales y prácticos en América Latina (1990–1999). Quito: FLACSO; 1999.
58. 58 Lavell A. Los desastres son construcciones sociales: una perspectiva crítica de la gestión del riesgo. LA RED – Red de Estudios Sociales en Prevención de Desastres en América Latina; 1993.
59. 59 Leff E. Aventuras de la epistemología ambiental. México: Siglo XXI Editores; 2006.
60. 60 Li Z-C, Li L-J, Huang J-L. The effectiveness of a resilience support policy for emergency responders: quasi-experimental evidence from Croatia. Safety Science 2026;194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.107044..
61. 61 Lin Y, Xu Y, Zhao Z, Tu W, Park S, Li Q. Assessing effects of pandemic-related policies on individual public transit travel patterns: A Bayesian online changepoint detection based framework. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 2024;181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104003..
62. 62 Lorenzo M, Ríos-Rodríguez ML, Chinea-Montesdeoca C, Hernández-Ruiz B, Rosales C. Green Social Work as a Framework for Soc io-Environmental Transformation: A Systematic Review. Social Sciences 2025;14. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14120720..
63. 63 Lucatello S, Alcántara-Ayala I. Sustainable Synergy: Strengthening disaster risk reduction in Latin America and the Caribbean through nature-based solutions. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 2024;113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104860..
64. 64 Luo M, Liu S, Gao Y, Sun Y, Yang C, Zhang Y, et al. Application of the Nature⁃based Solutions concept in the ecological barrier construction in the Northern Sand Prevention Belt. Shengtai Xuebao/Acta Ecologica Sinica 2024;44:3121–31. https://doi.org/10.20103/j.stxb.202310062139..
65. 65 Mahmud R, Murshed SB, Sakib FM, Shampa n., Salehin M. Integrating forecast-based action and government-led social protection programs for flood response. Progress in Disaster Science 2026;29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100506..
66. 66 Maisha FM, Mbasa NM, Ulikuwe KM, Kahatwa S, Mulligan CJ, Morris JG, et al. Social dynamics influencing cholera risk in the City of Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2025;25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22981-0..
67. 67 Malhotra SK, Saran A, Bhandari R, Ojiambo KO, Shirodkar S, Stewart G, et al. Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Ecosystem-Based Disaster Risk Reduction Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Rapid Systematic Review: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews 2025;21. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70083..
68. 68 Mann M, Mitchell P, Foth M. Between surveillance and technological solutionism: A critique of privacy-preserving apps for COVID-19 contact-tracing. New Media and Society 2024;26:4099–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221109800..
69. 69 Mansourihanis O, Seyedebrahimi E, Zaroujtaghi A, Zafari T. Challenging Environmental Justice Assumptions: Geographic Dominance Over Social Vulnerability in Texas Hurricane Risk Distribution. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis 2025;9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-025-00239-y..
70. 70 Mao X, Suo Y, Wei X, Luo Y. Resilience enhancement interventions for disaster rescue workers: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 2025;33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01397-0..
71. 71 Mao Y, Wang X, Bai Q, He W, Pan G. Simulated interventions based on virtual reality to improve emergency evacuation under different spatial perception models. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2024;99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103545..
72. 72 Martín-Barbero J. Las subculturas urbanas representan formas alternativas de convivencia, organización e identidad. En: Ciudadanías del miedo. 2000. p. 29-35.
73. 73 Maskrey A. Cap. 2: La aplicación de los sistemas de información geográfica al análisis de riesgos. En: Maskrey A. Navegando entre brumas: la aplicación de los sistemas de información geográfica al análisis de riesgos en América Latina. LA RED; 1998. p. 4-12.
74. 74 Mazumder RK, Sutley EJ. Modeling the Influence of Social Vulnerability and Financial Resources on Housing Functionality Restoration. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering 2025;11. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1526..
75. 75 Melese AK. Unpacking Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Mental Health in Internally Displaced Persons: A Mediation-Moderation Model of Psychological Capital and Perceived Social Support. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2025;22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22121788..
76. 76 Mintah EO, Elmarzouky M. Digital-Platform-Based Ecosystems: CSR Innovations during Crises. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 2024;17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17060247..
77. 77 Naidoo M, Shephard W, Kambewe I, Mtshali N, Cope S, Rubio FA, et al. Incorporating social vulnerability in infectious disease mathematical modelling: a scoping review. BMC Medicine 2024;22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03333-y..
78. 78 O’Grady N. On the possibility of ‘Just Resilience’: A pragmatist approach to justice-based climate change governance. Geoforum 2025;159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104163..
79. 79 Okuzono SS, Shiba K, Zhu DT, Oh S, Hsu Y-T, Yazawa A, et al. Disaster-related home loss, mental health, and risk of cognitive disability: causal mediation analysis using longitudinal data of disaster survivors. American Journal of Epidemiology 2025;194:3501–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf208..
80. 80 Oliver-Smith A. Perspectivas antropológicas en la investigación de desastres. Red de Estudios Sociales en Prevención de Desastres en América Latina; 1995. p. 1-21.
81. 81 Onsay EA, Rabajante JF. Measuring the unmeasurable multidimensional poverty for economic development: Datasets, algorithms, and models from the poorest region of Luzon, Philippines. Data in Brief 2024;53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110150..
82. 82 Opiyo SB, Opinde G, Letema S. A perspective of sustainable livelihood framework in analysis of sustainability of rural community livelihoods: evidence from Migori River watershed in Kenya. International Journal of River Basin Management 2024;22:627–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2023.2216019..
83. 83 Panja A, Garai S, Maiti S, Goswami R, Zade S, Veldandi A, et al. Mapping resilience pathway of smallholder farming community to cyclone-led climate disasters in coastal West Bengal, India. Global Environmental Change 2026;96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.103108..
84. 84 Park H-J, Yoon MS. Predictors of quality of life in disaster victims: A multilevel analysis of individual, community, and policy factors. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 2026;132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105954..
85. 85 Patro SK, Ahmed S. Urban Infrastructure Vulnerability to Resilience Through Urban Governance. vol. 723 LNCE, 2026, p. 347–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-0241-7_27..
86. 86 Pérez G, O’Leary BC, Allegri E, Casal G, Cornet CC, de Juan S, et al. A conceptual framework to help choose appropriate blue nature-based solutions. Journal of Environmental Management 2024;352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119936..
87. 87 Pinho PF, Silvestrini R, Fellows M, Perez L, Alencar A, Guyot C, et al. “Vulnerabilities and compound risks of escalating climate disasters in the Brazilian Amazon.” Nature Communications 2025;16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-66603-0..
88. 88 Piras F, Saiu V. Exploring Spatial Distribution and Interactions Toward SDG 11 Indicators at the Neighborhood Level: An Experimental Analysis. vol. 15893 LNCS, 2026, p. 337–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97645-2_22..
89. 89 Rajab-Kalantarzadeh M, Savari M. Impacts of resilience on food security in rural households of Iran under drought conditions using an extended sustainable livelihood framework. Results in Engineering 2025;26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105145..
90. 90 Reguillo R. La construcción simbólica de la ciudad: sociedad, desastre y comunicación. Guadalajara: ITESO / Universidad Iberoamericana; 1996.
91. 91 Sanson† AV, Masten AS. Climate change and resilience: Developmental science perspectives. International Journal of Behavioral Development 2024;48:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254231186332..
92. 92 Schuster RC, Wachter K, Hussain F, Gartin ML. Gendered effects of climate change and health inequities among forcibly displaced populations: Displaced Rohingya women foster resilience through technology. Journal of Climate Change and Health 2024;18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100303..
93. 93 Sert H, Baris Horzum M, Gulbahar M, Pelin M, Ucgul K. The disaster of the century, Kahramanmaras earthquake: A qualitative study on the experiences of the earthquake victims and search and rescue teams. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 2024;107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104462..
94. 94 Sett D, Trinh TP, Wasim T, Ortiz-Vargas A, Nguyen DGC, Büche K, et al. Advancing understanding of the complex nature of flood risks to inform comprehensive risk management: Findings from an urban region in Central Vietnam. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 2024;110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104652..
95. 95 Shahriar F, Tonmoy MSB, Yeasmin F. Stateless within the state: citizenship gain and livelihood scenario of the enclave dwellers in Bangladesh. GeoJournal 2025;90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-025-11520-4..
96. 96 Shokouhi M, Ramezani F, Fardi A, Afshari M, Khazaei S, Rezapur-Shahkolai F. Fire safety measures in commercial complex residents: Application of protection motivation theory. Burns 2026;52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2025.107830..
97. 97 Slobodin O, Cohen O. A culturally-competent approach to emergency management: What lessons can we learn from the COVID-19? Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy 2025;12:470–3. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000790..
98. 98 Slobodin O, Kula Y, Clempert N, Cohen O. Building capacity in times of crisis: Increasing cultural competence of healthcare professionals in the context of the COVID-19. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2025;34:5224–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15897..
99. 99 Song C, Atun F, Blanford JI, Anthonj C. Germany Ahr Valley flood 2021: a social and mental health perspective of older adults (65+) experiences. Wellbeing, Space and Society 2026;10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2025.100332..
100. 100 Sovacool BK, Fritz L, Baum CM, Losi L, Debnath R, Walnum HJ, et al. Social attitudes towards climate interventions: Are European publics uninformed about carbon removal and solar radiation management? Environmental Science and Policy 2025;174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104287..
101. 101 Su H, Zhao X, Wang L, Li Y. How rural community resilience evolves after a disaster? A case study of the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Applied Geography 2024;165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103238..
102. 102 Subroto S, Datta R. Perspectives of racialized immigrant communities on adaptability to climate disasters following the UN Roadmap for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2030. Sustainable Development 2024;32:1386–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2676..
103. 103 Tamir TT, Tekeba B, Mekonen EG, Gebrehana DA, Zegeye AF. Shadows of trauma: an umbrella review of the prevalence and risk factors of post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 2025;19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-025-00879-4..
104. 104 Taylor SJ, Bogdan R. Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación: la búsqueda de significados. Barcelona: Paidós; 1987.
105. 105 Teku D, Sisay T, Ali A, Ayalew A. Optimizing Flood Hazard Zonation and Planning Landscape-Based Mitigation Measures in Gimba Sub Watersheds, Northeastern Ethiopia: A Comprehensive Approach. Journal of Flood Risk Management 2026;19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70172..
106. 106 Teku D, Tariku GD. Effectiveness of early-warning systems and disaster risk reduction for rural food security under hydro-meteorological hazards in Sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 2026;33:101–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2025.2595056..
107. 107 Thirunavukkarasu A, Alsaidan AA, Abdel-Salam DM. Evaluation of awareness, attitudes, and practices towards disaster preparedness among Saudi healthcare professionals: implications for enhancing emergency response and training. PeerJ 2025;13. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20464..
108. 108 Topal S, Yalnızoğlu Çaka SY, Uysal G, Alabay E, Demir Y, Cömertoğlu Arslan SC. The effect of therapeutic play-based intervention programme applied to earthquake victim preschool children on psychosocial well-being: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychology 2025;13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03317-4..
109. 109 UNDRR. Marco de Sendai para la Reducción del Riesgo de Desastres 2015-2030. Naciones Unidas; 2015. Disponible en: https://www.unisdr.org/files/43291_spanishsendaiframeworkfordisasterri.pdf
110. 110 Usher K, Durkin J, Badu N, Warsini S, Jackson D. Preparedness for viral respiratory infection pandemic in residential aged care facilities: A review of the literature to inform post-COVID-19 response. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2025;34:4944–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15863..
111. 111 Vicarelli M, Sudmeier-Rieux K, Alsadadi A, Shrestha A, Schütze S, Kang MM, et al. On the cost-effectiveness of Nature-based Solutions for reducing disaster risk. Science of the Total Environment 2024;947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174524..
112. 112 Witt A, Sachser C, Fegert JM. Scoping review on trauma and recovery in youth after natural disasters: what Europe can learn from natural disasters around the world. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2024;33:651–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-022-01983-y..
113. 113 Wu Y-L, Lin T-W, Lam J, Wang SSC, Lo HHM. Resilience, coping strategies, and disaster experience: a path analysis of preparedness and avoidance in Taiwan. BMC Public Health 2025;25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21361-y..
114. 114 Xu W, Zhang Y, Proverbs D, Zhong Z. Enhancing the resilience of road networks to flooding. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation 2024;42:213–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-09-2021-0120..
115. 115 Yang B, Lin Y, Xiong W, Liu C, Gao H, Ho F, et al. Comparison of control and transmission of COVID-19 across epidemic waves in Hong Kong: an observational study. The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific 2024;43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100969..
116. 116 Yncera N de la C. Resiliencia comunitaria frente al riesgo de desastre de origen natural en Yautepec, Morelos [Tesis doctoral]. Cuernavaca: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos; 2019.
117. 117 Zhang CS, Kim S. Platform-generated misinformation warning labels during disasters: A U.S.-China comparative study. Telematics and Informatics 2026;104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2025.102356..
118. 118 Zhang Y, Wang Z, Qin Y, Jin S. Research on the relationship between perceived social support and positive coping style of fire rescue personnel with the mediating effects of positive emotions and meaning in life. Scientific Reports 2025;15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91799-y..
119. 119 Zheng P, Adams PC, Wang J. Shifting moods on Sina Weibo: The first 12 weeks of COVID-19 in Wuhan. New Media and Society 2024;26:346–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211058850..
120. 120 Zigdon A, Lavenda O, Lewin E. National resilience: Development and validation of a new four-dimensional model for disaster preparedness assessment. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience 2026;7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2025.100228..
121. 121 Zyoud S, Zyoud AH. Advancing sustainable cities and communities with internet of things: Global insights, trends, and research priorities for SDG 11. Results in Engineering 2025;26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104917..