SAP Nursing Depths Series
SAP Nursing Depths Series

Palliative care and nursing attitudes: keys to dignified end-of-life care

Angy L Camargo Angel1 , Daniel J Duran González1 , Lizeth N Vásquez Rondón1 , Marlyn S Galvis Caro1 , María A Pulido Montes1 , Luz M Contreras Ramos1
1Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, Facultad de Enfermería. Bucaramanga, Colombia.

https://doi.org/10.56294/nds2025153

PDF XML

Abstract

Introduction: End-of-life care gained increasing relevance in the face of population aging and the increase of chronic diseases. The WHO estimated that the need for palliative care would double by 2060, highlighting the importance of the role of nurses in end-of-life care. However, deficiencies in academic training and inappropriate attitudes were identified that limited the quality of such care. Development: This review addressed fundamental concepts such as dying patient, death, palliative care and attitude. The most common attitudes towards the end of life were described: fear, denial, avoidance and acceptance. Scales used to measure these attitudes were also analyzed, such as the FATCOD, the Collet-Lester and the Revised Profile of Attitudes Toward Death (PAM-R), validated in various countries. It was found that nursing staff attitudes were influenced by cultural, educational and personal factors. In addition, barriers to empathic care were identified, such as fear of death and lack of adequate tools during professional training. Conclusions: It was concluded that nursing staff attitudes were determinant in the quality of palliative care. The review showed the need to strengthen emotional and ethical training from undergraduate level, incorporating valid assessment tools. The role of the nurse was not only focused on physical care, but also on emotional and spiritual accompaniment. Encouraging positive attitudes from the training allowed providing a more humane and dignified care at the end of life.

Keywords

palliative care, attitudes, nursing, terminal patient, professional training

INTRODUCTION

Population aging and the increase in chronic noncommunicable diseases have led to a significant growth in the demand for palliative care worldwide.(1,2,3,4) According to the World Health Organization (WHO), it is estimated that by 2060, this need will double, becoming a priority for health systems.(1,6,7,8) In this context, nursing staff are central in providing comprehensive care to patients at the end of life, focusing on the individual and their family.(9,10,11,12)

However, several studies show that significant barriers still limit quality care in these contexts. Among the most relevant are deficiencies in academic training and the lack of appropriate attitudes to accompany the dying process.(13,14,15) These deficiencies affect the ability of nursing professionals to provide humane, empathetic, and competent care in hospital and community settings.(2,16,17)

The attitude of healthcare personnel toward death and terminal patients is a determining factor in the quality of palliative care.(18,19,20) Multiple factors influence these attitudes, such as academic training, professional experience, personal beliefs, and cultural context. Therefore, it is essential that initial nursing training promotes competencies that allow students to acquire technical knowledge and develop a deep understanding of the human dimension of the dying process.(21,22)

Despite the importance of the subject, there are still gaps in the literature regarding the specific attitudes of nursing professionals toward the care of terminally ill patients, as well as the tools used to assess these attitudes.

Objective

To review the available scientific evidence on the attitudes of nursing staff toward the care of patients at the end of life, identifying the factors that condition them, the most commonly used instruments for measuring them, and the implications for professional training and clinical practice.

DEVELOPMENT

Theoretical framework

Definitions

Dying patient

Defined as "a person who will die within six months despite medical therapy; the last two weeks of life are considered the final stage".(3,23,24)

A dying patient is a person who has different needs from other people. As time passes, the disease of a terminal or dying patient progresses, making the moment of death more predictable due to the complications that arise during the terminal stage.(4,25,26)

Palliative care

Palliative care is an interdisciplinary approach focused on patients with advanced or terminal illnesses and their families. Its objectives are to provide quality of life and relief from suffering through overall control of symptoms and respect for values and beliefs.(5,27,28)

Palliative care refers to actions aimed at improving the quality of life of individuals and their families, who also experience what it means to live with life-threatening illnesses. These actions include pain prevention, relief, communication, and emotional support.(1,29,30)

Death

This refers to when the vital organs collapse, causing all bodily functions to cease. This can happen suddenly, caused by acute illnesses, accidents, or terminal illnesses.(6,31,32,33)

According to Avalos, to define death, it is essential to specify that it is considered the biological cessation of functions that previously defined human vitality, such as brain and cardiovascular activity and the total loss of respiratory patterns.(7,34,35,36)

Law 1733 of 2014, Consuelo Devís Saavedra Law

Palliative care is provided to people with chronic, terminal, and irreversible illnesses to manage symptoms such as pain, among others. This care requires a multidisciplinary and family-centered approach throughout the disease. "The goal of palliative care is to achieve the best possible quality of life for the patient and their family".(8,37,38,39)

Attitude

Attitude is a psychological construct that allows behavioral tendencies to be mobilized through cognitive, emotional, and rational components. In this sense, it is essential to emphasize that attitude mobilizes human beings in their style of thinking and acting. Therefore, attitudes imply that our responses can be constructive or unfavorable, considering the context, values, and beliefs.(9,40,41,42)

Attitudes toward the end of life

After a person is born, the path to death also begins to be irreversible; death is a natural and irreversible phenomenon.(10,43,44) Today's culture does not accept death and does not know how to deal with it. When we talk about dying patients, we need to understand that these are people who are living the last moments of their lives.(11,45,46)

Terminally ill patients are patients who are going through the process of dying. This phase can be delayed by a few hours or extended for months. During this time, those affected experience unpleasant symptoms and emotional and cognitive reactions, depending on the process of the disease they are suffering from and their imminent death.(11)

When faced with death, humans experience different emotions that cause them to adopt different attitudes, including acceptance, denial, and/or avoidance.(12,47,48)

Fear is a reaction humans have to the process of death, influenced by feelings of fear, uncertainty, pain, and distress, both in the person and their family in a palliative situation.(13,49,50)

Denial: this is a typical response of people who are undergoing a stressful situation that involves all dimensions of the human being: physical, psychological, and social.(13,51,52)

Avoidance: this is the stance of denial in the face of death and everything it encompasses.(13,53,54)

Acceptance: "a state of calm associated with the understanding that death and other losses are natural phenomena in human life".(13,55,56)

Scales that measure attitudes toward death

The scales that have been used to measure attitudes toward death are described in the following table (table 1).

Table 1. Scales of attitudes toward death

Name, author

Purpose of thescale

Items and subscales

The Collet-Lester scale was created by Jessica Collet and David Lester in 1969.(14)

Differentiating between fear and death.

It has 28 items on a scale of 6 to 1.Fear of one's own death, fear of the death of others, fear of the process of dying, and fear of the process of others dying.(15)

The Revised Profile of Attitudes Toward Death Scale (PAM-R). It was developed by Gesser, Wong, and Reker in 1988.(12)

Measuring the attitudes of professionals toward people in palliative care and their dying process.(12)

The scale has 32 items ranging from 1 to 7, from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Its dimensions are: acceptance and approach, fear of death, avoidance of death, acceptance of escape, and neutral acceptance.(16)

La escala Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale (FATCOD) fue diseñada por la investigadora Katherine Frommelt en 1989.(17)

Assess nurses' attitudes toward caring for terminally ill patients and their families.(17)

The scale consists of 30 items with Likert responses ranging from 1 to 5. Fifteen items are worded positively (questions 1, 2, 4, 10, 12, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, and 30), while the other 15 are worded negatively. The possible scores range from 30 to 150; the higher the score, the more positive the attitudes toward caring for the dying patient. Twenty questions assess nurses' attitudes toward terminally ill patients and 10 assess attitudes toward the families of terminally ill patients.(18)

The FATCOD scale measures six specific dimensions that should be emphasized during the educational preparation of health students, which are: Fear/Discomfort, Family Care, Communication, Family as Caregiver, Relationship, and Active Care.(19)

Countries with validation of the FATCOD scale

This scale has been widely used. The results obtained in several countries are described below.

Studies conducted in Japan found that the first factor, FATCOD I (positive attitudes toward caring for dying patients), was internally consistent.

(Cronbach's α) of 0,73, while the second factor, FATCOD II (perceptions of patient- and family-centered care), had an α value of 0,65. The internal consistency for the total FATCOD-Form BJ was 0,85.(20) On the other hand, in another study, Cronbach's α was 0,91, and the intraclass correlation in the test-retest was 0,94.(21,57,58)

When using the FATCOD scale for studies in China, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0,790. The overall content validity index was 0,92.(22,59,60) In Egypt, the reliability of the scale has been established several times. The Pearson coefficient was 0,94.(23)

Two studies were found in Turkey, the first of which determined that Cronbach's α value of the scale was 0,73. Cronbach's alpha value in this study was 0,93.(24) The following study showed that the FATCOD scale was also subjected to reliability analysis, showing that Cronbach's coefficient varied between 0,605 and 0,800 for the factors. Cronbach's alpha value was 0,783.(25)

The validity of the FATCOD scale in Sweden showed that values below 0,08 were considered satisfactory. The average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) were calculated to fit the measurement model. Values above 0,5 (AVE) and above 0,7 (CR) indicate good convergent validity. Reliability was measured using internal consistency (Cronbach's α), where Cronbach's α values were higher.(26,61,62)

In Italy, Cronbach's α was 0,68 for the entire scale, 0,72 for factor I, 0,68 for factor II, 0,71 for factor III, and 0,11 for factor IV.(27) The study conducted in Spain shows Cronbach's alpha for factor I to be 0,73, while for factor II, it was 0,65. The internal consistency for the total form was 0,85.(28,63,64)

In addition, the present method "has been validated and used in Mexico in its Spanish version, with a Cronbach's alpha reliability of 0,87 in this population".(29) It is a valid and reliable measure of patients' end-of-life experiences in the United States, with an alpha coefficient of 0,98.(17) Finally, the study conducted in Chile shows "a Cronbach's α of 0,80 and significant criterion validity when compared to other scales".(9,65,66)

The role of nursing in caring for the dying patient

Nurses who work with patients at the end of their lives and are more exposed to the entire life cycle process face situations that can generate conflicts and changes in attitudes toward patient care and self-care, all based on their own experience. These attitudes help us organize, direct, and regulate the actions of individual and group healthcare professionals, many of whom experience emotions such as fear and dread of death.(12,67,68)

When it comes to emotional support and accompaniment, nurses provide a measure of adaptive support, applying different communication, outreach, and assistance strategies to meet the needs of family members. Nurses create environments where family members can express their doubts and feelings, creating a good relationship between the patient and the family and allowing them to express their feelings and reflect during the end-of-life process.(30)

The role of nurses at the end of life is broad and consists of several processes. The first is to be present, listen, provide comfort, and minimize pain and suffering. The second is to clarify concerns to family members and patients about the decisions made by healthcare personnel for the patient's improvement, well-being, and peace of mind. The third encompasses the patient's final journey toward death. The nurse provides full support to the family, allowing them to express their emotions and feelings so that the patient can have a peaceful end of life.(31)

Nursing is a vocation, care, love, responsibility, commitment, and humanity. Nurses are firmly committed to patients and their families until the end. In addition to providing care and attention, nurses also show emotion when patients die because they adopt them as family members. The appropriation of care makes nurses sensitive to the different situations and emotions that patients go through. However, the care and interventions nurses provide do not always meet the needs of patients and their families, so a commitment is made to ensure that patients have a humane end of life.(32,69)

End-of-life theory

Within the nursing discipline, there is a theoretical position proposed by Ruland & Moore, "whose fundamental objective is to achieve a dignified and peaceful death, based on five fundamental outcomes: absence of pain, experience of well-being, experience of dignity and respect, state of tranquility, and closeness to loved ones".(33)

The fundamental outcomes highlighted by Ruland and Moore are:

Absence of pain: it is important to understand patients' perceptions of the end-of-life experience, which includes being free from physical suffering. Pain is a particular sensation characterized by sensory or emotional discomfort.(33)

Experience of well-being is defined as a total state of satisfaction, well-being, relief, and relaxation.(33)

Experience of dignity and respect: this is the value and ethical principle of autonomy and respect for those who are terminally ill, who must be treated and respected as autonomous beings.(33)

State of tranquility: feelings of tranquility include serenity, calm, peace, absence of anxiety, and no actions that cause unease or discomfort. Being calm encompasses physical, psychological, and spiritual dimensions.(33,70)

Proximity to loved ones: proximity is the action of being closely connected to people you care about; it involves a close connection that includes physical or emotional support.(33)

About Ruland and Moore's theory of a peaceful end of life, few articles were found that show its application or reference to people at the end of life or with terminal illnesses. However, in a study conducted in Thailand in 2009, which aimed to explore how intensive care nurses promoted a peaceful end of life in their patients, they evaluated how they created and promoted care environments so that patients did not feel pain but rather expressed comfort by providing them with dignity and respect.(34,71)

As mentioned above, over the years in southern Thailand, a phenomenological study was conducted in which interviews were conducted with Buddhist families who had experienced the death of loved ones in intensive care units. They mentioned five qualities that in some way defined what a peaceful death is, where the main idea was that death was a natural process of life and that we should be at peace, seeking mental tranquility in order to grieve without pain, that it is always better to be in the company of our family members and not go through this process alone. Moreover, most importantly, they do not live with regrets.(35,72)

In another review, a study conducted in Taiwan in 2009 was found, which aimed to evaluate the ethical dilemmas that arise in intensive care units, where patient mortality is a daily experience, which means that the practice of good end-of-life care is not optimal or beneficial. They mentioned that to provide quality care, autonomy, palliative care, ethics, and justice must be considered, characteristics that are as important as providing pharmacological treatment and life support to those in care.(36,73)

On the other hand, in 2002, Kirchhoff sought to describe how a terminally ill patient in the intensive care unit can be given a peaceful death, considering that these areas of hospitals and clinics are not considered good places to die. He mentions that a peaceful death must go hand in hand with a good death in order to reduce suffering for both the patient and the family, taking into account quality standards and holistic care.(37)

CONCLUSIONS

End-of-life care represents one of the most significant challenges for the nursing profession, not only because of its clinical complexity but also because of the profound emotional, ethical, and human burden it entails. This review has shown that nursing professionals' attitudes toward dying patients directly influence the quality of care provided. These attitudes, far from secondary elements, act as determinants of the practical, empathetic, and dignified support patients require in their final days.

One of the key findings is that the attitude of nursing staff is strongly influenced by factors such as academic training, personal experiences, cultural context, and religious beliefs. Evidence shows that when these variables are not adequately addressed during training, obstacles such as fear, avoidance, and denial of death arise. These attitudes hinder patient-centered care and can affect the professional and the patient's family.

Likewise, the importance of valid and reliable tools for assessing nursing staff attitudes toward death and palliative care is highlighted. Scales such as the FATCOD, the Revised Profile of Attitudes Toward Death (PAM-R), and the Collet-Lester scale allow for the identification of critical aspects in professional preparation and facilitate effective educational interventions. These tools have been validated in various international contexts, reinforcing their usefulness for comparative research and curriculum improvements.

Another fundamental aspect addressed in this review is the role of nurses as key figures in the emotional and spiritual support of dying patients. Beyond clinical care, nurses represent a constant presence that provides comfort, communicates difficult decisions, and helps families navigate the grieving process. To fulfill this role effectively, professionals must develop communication skills, ethical sensitivity, and an attitude of acceptance toward death as a natural part of life.

Ultimately, fostering positive attitudes toward the end of life through university education and ongoing clinical practice will enable the training of professionals who are technically competent and emotionally prepared to provide high-quality palliative care. Education in human values, reflective practice, and institutional support are essential pillars for achieving a dignified and humane death for those facing the end of life.

References

  1. 1 Organización Mundial de la Salud. La OMS toma medidas para abordar la flagrante escasez de servicios de cuidados paliativos de calidad [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 May 24]. https://www.who.int/es/news/item/05-10-2021-who-takes-steps-to-address-glaring-shortage-of-quality-palliative-care-services
  2. 2 Secpal. Guía de Cuidados Paliativos [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2025 May 24]. https://www.secpal.com/biblioteca_guia-cuidados-paliativos_2-definicion-de-enfermedad-terminal
  3. 3 Steinberg A, Sprung CL. The dying patient: New Israeli legislation. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(8):1234–7. doi:10.1007/s00134-006-0186-6
  4. 4 Cobbs E, Blackstone K, Lynn J. El paciente moribundo - Temas especiales - Manual MSD versión para profesionales. Manual MSD; 2019. https://www.msdmanuals.com/es-mx/professional/temas-especiales/el-paciente-moribundo/el-paciente-moribundo
  5. 5 Cordeiro FR, Griebeler Oliveira S, Zeppini Giudice J, Pellegrini Fernandes V, Timm Oliveira A. Definitions for “palliative care”, “end-of-life” and “terminally ill” in oncology: a scoping review. Enferm Cuid Human. 2020;9(2):205–28. doi:10.22235/ech.v9i2.2317
  6. 6 Souza LP, Mota J, Barbosa R, Ribeiro RC, Oliveira CS, Barbosa DA. A morte e o processo de morrer: sentimentos manifestados por enfermeiros. Enferm Glob. 2013;12(32):230–7. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=93609100&lang=es&site=ehost-live
  7. 7 Avalos MA. La salud-enfermedad y muerte desde un abordaje etnográfico. Misiones-Argentina. Rev Urug Antropol Etnogr. 2018;3(1):79–90. http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2393-68862018000100079
  8. 8 Congreso de la República. Ley 1733 de 2014. Diario Oficial Congreso de La República. 2014. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=59379
  9. 9 Espinosa S. Afrontamiento del profesional de enfermería ante la muerte de pacientes en unidades de paliativos y oncología. NURE Investig. 2016;13(82):1–12. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6277911
  10. 10 Lynch G, Oddone J. La percepción de la muerte en el curso de la vida. Un estudio del papel de la muerte en los cambios y eventos biográficos. Rev Cienc Soc. 2017;30(40):129–50. http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0797-55382017000100007
  11. 11 Redaelli A. Hospice. El cuidado personalizado y humanizado del enfermo terminal. Ministri Degli Infermi. 2014. https://www.camilliani.org/a-redaelli-hospice-el-cuidado-personalizado-y-humanizado-del-enfermo-terminal/
  12. 12 Bermejo JC, Villacieros M, Hassoun H. Attitudes towards end-of-life patient care and fear of death in a healthcare student sample. Med Paliat. 2018;25(3):168–74. doi:10.1016/j.medipa.2017.02.004
  13. 13 García DJ, Ochoa MC, Briceño II. Actitud del personal de enfermería ante la muerte de la persona en la unidad de cuidados intensivos: estudio cuantitativo. Duazary. 2018;15(3):281. doi:10.21676/2389783x.2421
  14. 14 Simkin H, Quintero S. Validación de la Escala de Miedo a la Muerte. Psocial. 2017;3(1):1–7. https://publicaciones.sociales.uba.ar/index.php/psicologiasocial/article/view/2340/1985
  15. 15 Duran T, Vidales MAM, Aguilar MLM, Sánchez GG, Alpirez HÁ, Guevara SJL. Fear of death and quality of life in older adults. Enferm Glob. 2020;19(2):296–304. doi:10.6018/eglobal.364291
  16. 16 Cáceres DI, Cristancho LY, López LA. Attitudes of nurses towards the death of patients in an intensive care unit. Rev Cienc Salud. 2019;17(3):98–110. doi:10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/revsalud/a.8368
  17. 17 Frommelt KH. Attitudes toward care of the terminally ill: An educational intervention. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2003;20(1):13–22. doi:10.1177/104990910302000108
  18. 18 Espinoza M, Luengo L, Sanhueza O. Atitudes em profissionais de enfermagem chilenos para o cuidado no final da vida. Análise multivariada. Aquichan. 2016;16(4):430–46. doi:10.5294/aqui.2016.16.4.3
  19. 19 Mastroianni C, Piredda M, Taboga C, Mirabella F, Marfoli E, Casale G, et al. Frommelt attitudes toward care of the dying scale form B: Psychometric testing of the Italian version for students. Omega (Westport). 2015;70(3):227–50. doi:10.1177/0030222815568944
  20. 20 Miyashita M, Nakai Y, Sasahara T, Koyama Y, Shimizu Y, Tsukamoto N, et al. Nursing autonomy plays an important role in nurses’ attitudes toward caring for dying patients. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2007;24(3):202–10. doi:10.1177/1049909106298396
  21. 21 Morita T, Murata H, Hirai K, Tamura K, Kataoka J, Ohnishi H, et al. Meaninglessness in terminally ill cancer patients: A validation study and nurse education intervention trial. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;34(2):160–70. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.021
  22. 22 Wang LP, Li YJ, Yan WZ, Li GM. Development and psychometric testing Chinese version of the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale, Form B in nurses and nursing students. J Cancer Educ. 2016;31(1):123–30. doi:10.1007/s13187-015-0810-7
  23. 23 Mohamed A, Saied N. Nurses’ attitudes toward caring for dying patient in Mansoura University Hospitals. J Med Biomed Sci. 2010;1(1):16–23. https://www.academia.edu/5030870/ِ_NURSES_ATTITUDES_TOWARD_CARING_FOR_DYING_PATIENT_IN_MANSOURA_UNIVERSITY_HOSPITALS
  24. 24 Gurdogan EP, Kınıcı E, Aksoy B. The relationship between death anxiety and attitudes toward the care of dying patient in nursing students. Psychol Health Med. 2019;24(1):843–52. doi:10.1080/13548506.2019.1576914
  25. 25 Akbolat M, Ünal Ö, Karakaya BG. Turkish Adaptation of the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale. Omega (Westport). 2022;84(4):1160–74. doi:10.1177/0030222820930139
  26. 26 Henoch I, Browall M, Melin-Johansson C, Danielson E, Udo C, Sundler AJ, et al. The Swedish version of the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale: Aspects of validity and factors influencing nurses’ and nursing students’ attitudes. Cancer Nurs. 2014;37(1):1–11. doi:10.1097/NCC.0b013e318279106b
  27. 27 Leombruni P, Loera B, Miniotti M, Zizzi F, Castelli L, Torta R. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale (FATCOD-B) among Italian medical students. Palliat Support Care. 2015;13(5):1391–8. doi:10.1017/S1478951515000139
  28. 28 Edo M, Tomás J, Gómez J, Monforte C, Aradilla A. Spanish Adaptation of the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale (FATCOD-S) in Nursing Undergraduates. Omega (Westport). 2018;78(2):120–42. doi:10.1177/0030222816688294
  29. 29 Ortega D, Ortega JA, Guerrero RF. Conocimientos sobre cuidados paliativos en un grupo de enfermeras en México. Rev Colomb Enferm. 2019;18(1):1–8. doi:10.18270/rce.v18i1.2368
  30. 30 González M, Díaz de Herrera P, Martínez ML. The role of the nurse at the end of the life of a critically ill patient. Enferm Intensiva. 2019;30(2):78–91. doi:10.1016/j.enfi.2018.02.001
  31. 31 Bach V, Ploeg J, Black M. Nursing roles in end-of-life decision making in critical care settings. West J Nurs Res. 2009;31(4):496–512. doi:10.1177/0193945908331178
  32. 32 Betancur MAL. Nursing care of patients during the dying process: A painful professional and human function. Investig Educ Enferm. 2015;33(2):297–304. doi:10.17533/udea.iee.v33n2a12
  33. 33 Alligood MR, Marriner Tomey A. Modelos y teorías de enfermería. 8a ed. Elsevier; 2015. https://www.congresohistoriaenfermeria2015.com/modelos.html
  34. 34 Kongsuwan W, Chaipetch O, Matchim Y. Thai Buddhist families’ perspective of a peaceful death in ICUs. Nurs Crit Care. 2012;17(3):151–9. doi:10.1111/j.1478-5153.2012.00495.x
  35. 35 Kongsuwan W, Locsin R. Promoting peaceful death in the intensive care unit in Thailand. Int Nurs Rev. 2009;56(1):116–22. doi:10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00674.x
  36. 36 Lee SY, Hung CL, Lee JH, Shih SC, Weng YL, Chang WH, et al. Attaining good end-of-life care in intensive care units in Taiwan - The dilemma and the strategy. Int J Gerontol. 2009;3(1):26–30. doi:10.1016/S1873-9598(09)70017-1
  37. 37 Kirchhoff KT. Promoting a peaceful death in the ICU. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2002;14(2):201–6. doi:10.1016/S0899-5885(01)00012-0
  38. 38 Abu Hasheesh MO, Al-Sayed AboZeid S, Goda El-Said S, Alhujaili AD. Nurses’ characteristics and their attitudes toward death and caring for dying patients in a public hospital in Jordan. Health Sci J. 2013;7(4):384–94. https://www-proquest-com.bbibliograficas.ucc.edu.co/docview/1462404136?pq-origsite=primo&accountid=44394
  39. 39 Ajisegiri WS, Abubakar AA, Gobir AA, Balogun MS, Sabitu K. Palliative care for people living with HIV/AIDS: Factors influencing healthcare workers’ knowledge, attitude and practice in public health facilities, Abuja, Nigeria. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0207499. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207499
  40. 40 Boatemaa A, Basour A, Setorglo J, Tetteh M, Bonsu L. Palliative care practices among nurses at Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Ghana: A cross-sectional study. Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2022;17:100454. doi:10.1016/j.ijans.2022.100454
  41. 41 Braun M, Gordon D, Uziely B. Associations between oncology nurses’ attitudes toward death and caring for dying patients. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37(1):E43–9. doi:10.1188/10.ONF.E43-E49
  42. 42 Browall M, Pakpour AH, Melin-Johansson C, Lundh Hagelin C, Österlind J, Henoch I. Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Short Version of the Swedish Frommelt Attitudes Toward Care of the Dying Scale. Cancer Nurs. 2021;44(4):305–13. doi:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000794
  43. 43 Dame L, Hoebeke R. Effects of a simulation exercise on nursing students’ end-of-life care attitudes. J Nurs Educ. 2016;55(12):701–5. doi:10.3928/01484834-20161114-07
  44. 44 Dimoula M, Kotronoulas G, Katsaragakis S, Christou M, Sgourou S, Patiraki E. Undergraduate nursing students’ knowledge about palliative care and attitudes towards end-of-life care: A three-cohort, cross-sectional survey. Nurse Educ Today. 2019;74:7–14. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.11.025
  45. 45 Dunn KS, Otten C, Stephens E. Nursing experience and the care of dying patients. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32(1):97–104. doi:10.1188/05.ONF.97-104
  46. 46 Etafa W, Wakuma B, Fetensa G, Tsegaye R, Abdisa E, Oluma A, et al. Nurses’ knowledge about palliative care and attitude towards end-of-life care in public hospitals in Wollega zones: A multicenter cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0238357. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238357
  47. 47 Ford R, McInerney F. An evaluation of aged-care workers’ knowledge of and attitudes toward the palliative approach. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2011;4(4):251–9. doi:10.3928/19404921-20101103-01
  48. 48 Fristedt S, Grynne A, Melin-Johansson C, Henoch I, Hagelin CL, Browall M. Registered nurses and undergraduate nursing students’ attitudes to performing end-of-life care. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;98:104772. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104772
  49. 49 Gameel W, Saied N. Nurses’ attitudes toward caring for dying patient in Mansoura University Hospitals. J Med Biomed Sci. 2010;10:16–23. https://www.academia.edu/5030870/ِ_NURSES_ATTITUDES_TOWARD_CARING_FOR_DYING_PATIENT_IN_MANSOURA_UNIVERSITY_HOSPITALS
  50. 50 Gelegjamts D, Yong Yoo J, Kim J, Sun Kim J. Undergraduate nursing students’ palliative care knowledge and attitudes towards end-of-life care: a cross-sectional descriptive study. Contemp Nurse. 2020;56(5–6):477–90. doi:10.1080/10376178.2021.1890165
  51. 51 Hao Y, Zhan L, Huang M, Cui X, Zhou Y, Xu E. Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes towards palliative care and death: a learning intervention. BMC Palliat Care. 2021;20(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/s12904-021-00738-x
  52. 52 Henoch I, Melin-Johansson C, Bergh I, Strang S, Ek K, Hammarlund K, et al. Undergraduate nursing students’ attitudes and preparedness toward caring for dying persons – A longitudinal study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017;26:12–20. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2017.06.007
  53. 53 Huriah T, Hidayah N, Mikami A. Attitudes and associated factors towards care for dying patients among non-palliative care nurses, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Indones J Nurs Pract. 2021;5(1):9–16. doi:10.18196/ijnp.v5i1.10131
  54. 54 Jafari M, Rafiei H, Nassehi A, Soleimani F, Arab M, Noormohammadi M. Caring for dying patients: Attitude of nursing students and effects of education. Indian J Palliat Care. 2015;21(2):192–7. doi:10.4103/0973-1075.156497
  55. 55 Karadag E, Parlar Kilic S, Ugur O, Akyol MA. Attitudes of nurses in Turkey toward care of dying individual and the associated religious and cultural factors. J Relig Health. 2019;58(1):303–16. doi:10.1007/s10943-018-0657-4
  56. 56 Kim JS, Kim J, Gelegjamts D. Knowledge, attitude and self-efficacy towards palliative care among nurses in Mongolia: A cross-sectional descriptive study. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0236390. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236390
  57. 57 Lange M, Thom B, Kline NE. Assessing nurses’ attitudes toward death and caring for dying patients in a comprehensive cancer center. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2008;35(6):955–9. doi:10.1188/08.ONF.955-959
  58. 58 Laporte P, Juvet T, Desbiens JF, Tapp D, Pasquier J, Bornet MA. Factors affecting attitudes towards caring for terminally ill patients among nursing students in Switzerland: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e037553. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037553
  59. 59 Lemos SA, Aguiar AR, Sousa AR, Almeida M, Raposo M. Nursing students’ attitudes towards death and end-of-life care. Rev Enferm Referência. 2021;5(6):1–8. doi:10.12707/RV20111
  60. 60 Leombruni P, Miniotti M, Bovero A, Zizzi F, Castelli L, Torta R. Attitudes toward caring for dying patients: An overview among Italian nursing students and preliminary psychometrics of the FATCOD-B scale. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2013;4(3):1–9. doi:10.5430/jnep.v4n3p188
  61. 61 Mastroianni C, Marchetti A, D’Angelo D, Artico M, Giannarelli D, Magna E, et al. Italian nursing students’ attitudes towards care of the dying patient: A multi-center descriptive study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;104:104991. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104991
  62. 62 Ministerio de Salud. Resolución número 8430 de 1993. [Internet]. 1993 [cited 2025 May 24]. https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/DIJ/RESOLUCION-8430-DE-1993.PDF
  63. 63 Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Cuidados paliativos [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 May 24]. https://www.paho.org/es/temas/cuidados-paliativos
  64. 64 Oses M, Casas J, Seguel F. Competencias en fin de vida entre un grupo de enfermeros españoles y chilenos. Ene. 2020;14(2):1–20. doi:10.4321/s1988-348x2020000200012
  65. 65 Richoux DN, Chatmon BN, Davis AH, Sweeney B. Factors impacting pediatric registered nurse attitudes toward caring for dying children and their families: A descriptive study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2022;67:155–60. doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2022.09.010
  66. 66 Sadowska A, Nowak M, Czarkowska-Pączek B. Assessment of the reliability of the Polish language version of the FATCOD-B scale among nursing students. J Cancer Educ. 2021;36(3):561–6. doi:10.1007/s13187-019-01665-5
  67. 67 Seo K. Moderating effect of nurse’s character on the relationship between attitudes toward nursing care of the dying and performance of terminal care in South Korea. Healthc (Basel). 2021;9(9):1195. doi:10.3390/healthcare9091195
  68. 68 Seven A, Sert H. How the nurses’ attitude for dying patients and their knowledge about palliative care? Bezmialem Sci. 2020;8(3):250–7. doi:10.14235/bas.galenos.2019.3419
  69. 69 Tait V, Higgs M, Magann L, Dixon J, Davis JM, Fernandez R. Attitudes of nonpalliative care nurses towards palliative care. Int J Palliat Care. 2015;2015:1–6. doi:10.1155/2015/469174
  70. 70 Thi Thanh Vu H, Hoang Nguyen L, Xuan Nguyen T, Thi Hoai Nguyen T, Ngoc Nguyen T, Thi Thu Nguyen H, et al. Knowledge and attitude toward geriatric palliative care among health professionals in Vietnam. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(15):2656. doi:10.3390/ijerph16152656
  71. 71 Yamagata C, Matsumoto S, Miyashita M, Kanno Y, Taguchi A, Sato K, Fukahori H. Preliminary effect and acceptability of an intervention to improve end-of-life care in long-term-care facilities: A feasibility study. Healthc (Basel). 2021;9(9):1194. doi:10.3390/healthcare9091194
  72. 72 Yu H, Sun C, Xie L, Wang L, Song J, Zhu Y, et al. Using a mediating model of death attitude and meaning in life to understand nursing students attitude about hospice care. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;116:105448. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105448
  73. 73 Zhang J, Fu Y, Zhang H, Tang T, Yin M, Shi L. Analysis of factors influencing the attitudes towards the elderly of nursing students based on empathy and end-of-life care: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Open. 2022;9(5):2348–55. doi:10.1002/nop2.1245

Declarations

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Authorship contributions

Conceptualization: Angy L Camargo Angel, Daniel J Duran González, Lizeth N Vásquez Rondón, Marlyn S Galvis Caro, María A Pulido Montes, Luz M Contreras Ramos.

Data curation: Angy L Camargo Angel, Daniel J Duran González, Lizeth N Vásquez Rondón, Marlyn S Galvis Caro, María A Pulido Montes, Luz M Contreras Ramos.

Formal analysis: Angy L Camargo Angel, Daniel J Duran González, Lizeth N Vásquez Rondón, Marlyn S Galvis Caro, María A Pulido Montes, Luz M Contreras Ramos.

Research: Angy L Camargo Angel, Daniel J Duran González, Lizeth N Vásquez Rondón, Marlyn S Galvis Caro, María A Pulido Montes, Luz M Contreras Ramos.

Methodology: Angy L Camargo Angel, Daniel J Duran González, Lizeth N Vásquez Rondón, Marlyn S Galvis Caro, María A Pulido Montes, Luz M Contreras Ramos.

Project management: Angy L Camargo Angel, Daniel J Duran González, Lizeth N Vásquez Rondón, Marlyn S Galvis Caro, María A Pulido Montes, Luz M Contreras Ramos.

Software: Angy L Camargo Angel, Daniel J Duran González, Lizeth N Vásquez Rondón, Marlyn S Galvis Caro, María A Pulido Montes, Luz M Contreras Ramos.

Supervision: Angy L Camargo Angel, Daniel J Duran González, Lizeth N Vásquez Rondón, Marlyn S Galvis Caro, María A Pulido Montes, Luz M Contreras Ramos.

Validation: Angy L Camargo Angel, Daniel J Duran González, Lizeth N Vásquez Rondón, Marlyn S Galvis Caro, María A Pulido Montes, Luz M Contreras Ramos.

Visualization: Angy L Camargo Angel, Daniel J Duran González, Lizeth N Vásquez Rondón, Marlyn S Galvis Caro, María A Pulido Montes, Luz M Contreras Ramos.

Writing – original draft: Angy L Camargo Angel, Daniel J Duran González, Lizeth N Vásquez Rondón, Marlyn S Galvis Caro, María A Pulido Montes, Luz M Contreras Ramos.

Writing – review and editing: Angy L Camargo Angel, Daniel J Duran González, Lizeth N Vásquez Rondón, Marlyn S Galvis Caro, María A Pulido Montes, Luz M Contreras Ramos.

Citation copied